HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-01

Advancing Large AI Models: Integration of New Data Modalities and Expansion of Capabilities (AI, Data and Robotics Partnership) (RIA) -

⚫ indicates current topic
Node background color indicates the call topic status
Double click on a topic to center information around it.
Node size is proportional to distance from the current topic

About the connections

The graph above was generated based on the following links

  • HORIZON-CL4-2024-DIGITAL-EMERGING-01-04
    Industrial leadership in AI, Data and Robotics boosting competitiveness and the green transition (AI Data and Robotics Partnership) (IA)[[https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/662906/IPOL_STU(2021)662906_EN.pdf]]

    MOTIVATION Both topics cover a strong AI aspect, which can boost competitiveness for EU organizations.

  • HORIZON-CL4-2023-HUMAN-01-04
    Open innovation: Addressing Grand challenges in AI (AI Data and Robotics Partnership) (CSA)

    MOTIVATION Proposals under HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-01 are expected to dedicate tasks and resources to collaborate with and provide input to the open innovation challenge under HORIZON-CL4-2023-HUMAN-01-04.

  • DIGITAL-2024-AI-06-FINETUNE
    Making available a high performing open-source European foundation model for fine-tuning

    MOTIVATION DIGITAL-2024-AI-06-FINETUNE and HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-01 both centre on the development of European AI foundation models, only at different development stages and on different scales.

  • DIGITAL-2024-AI-06-LANGUAGE-01
    Alliance for Language Technologies (SG)

    MOTIVATION DIGITAL-2024-AI-06-LANGUAGE-01 centres on providing data for the development of European large language models, which may be used also as part of the multimodal foundation models developed under HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-01.

  • HORIZON-CL4-2023-HUMAN-01-03
    Natural Language Understanding and Interaction in Advanced Language Technologies (AI Data and Robotics Partnership) (RIA)

    MOTIVATION HORIZON-CL4-2023-HUMAN-01-03 Explores advanced NLP capabilities, improving AI’s ability to process and respond to multimodal inputs like text and audio.

Call text (as on F&T portal)

View on F&T portal
Expected Outcome:

Projects are expected to contribute to one or more of the following outcomes:

  • Enhanced applicability of large AI systems to new domains through the integration of innovative data modalities, such as sensor measurements (e.g. in robotics, IoT) or remote sensing (e.g. earth observation), as input.
  • Improvement of current multimodal large AI systems capabilities and expansion of the number of data modalities jointly handed by one AI system, leading to broader application potential and improved AI performance.
Scope:

Large artificial intelligence (AI) models refer to a new generation of general-purpose AI models (i.e., generative AI) capable of adapting to diverse domains and tasks without significant modification. Notable examples, such as OpenAI's GPT-4V and META’s Llama 2 or DinoV2, have demonstrated a wide and growing variety of capabilities.

The swift progression of large AI models in recent years holds immense potential to revolutionize various industries, due to their ability to adapt to diverse tasks and domains. For them to achieve their potential, access to vast data repositories, significant computing resources, and skilled engineers is required. A promising avenue of research is the development of multi-modal large AI models that can seamlessly integrate multiple modalities, including text, structured data, computer code, visual or audio media, robotics or IoT sensors, and remote sensing data.

This topic centres around the development of innovative multimodal large AI models, covering both the training of foundation models and their subsequent fine-tuning. These models should show superior capabilities across a wide array of down-stream tasks. The emphasis is both on integrating new input data modalities into large AI models and on developing multimodal large AI models with either significantly higher capabilities and/or the ability to handle a greater number of modalities.

Moreover, projects should contribute to reinforcing Europe's research excellence in the field of large AI models by driving substantial scientific progress and innovation in key large AI areas. This includes the development of novel methods for pretraining multimodal foundation models. Additionally, novel approaches to effective and efficient fine-tuning of such models should be pursued.

Research activities should explore innovative methodologies for enhancing the representation, alignment, and interaction among the different data modalities, thereby substantially improving the overall performance and trustworthiness of these models. Advances in efficient computation for the pre-training, execution and fine-tuning of foundation models to reduce their computational and environmental impact, and increasing the safety of models are also topics of interest.

Proposals should outline how the models will incorporate trustworthiness, considering factors such as explainability, security, and privacy in line with provisions in the upcoming Artificial Intelligence Act. Additionally, the models should incorporate characteristics that align with European values, and provide improved multilingual capabilities, where relevant.

Proposals should address at least one of the following focus areas:

  • the integration of innovative modalities of data for large AI models during training and inference. Examples of innovative modalities include event streams, structured data and sensor measurements. The incorporation of such new modalities could potentially bring unforeseen enhancements to model performance and enable their application in new domains like weather forecasting, robotics, and manufacturing.
  • enhanced multimodal models that exceed the current state of the art, with either significantly improved capabilities or the ability to handle a larger number of modalities. This focus area also encompasses models capable of multi-modal output generation. Current large-scale multimodal models most commonly engage with only vision and language.

Each proposal is expected to address all of the following:

  • Data Collection, Processing and Cross-modal Alignment. The proposal should describe convincingly the characteristics and availability of the large, trustworthy data sources, as well as the trustworthy data processing to be utilised within the project, detailing the data processing steps to ensure reliability, accountability and transparency, and the alignment of data among the different modalities. A modest portion (up to 10%) of the budget may be allocated to data collection activities; proposals may involve relevant data owners in this task, if necessary. Importantly, the proposal should delineate how potential privacy and IPR issues associated with the data will be managed and mitigated.
  • Multimodal Foundation Model Pretraining. The pretrained multimodal foundation model is expected to demonstrate high capabilities across a wide range of tasks. The pretraining tasks used should be agnostic of down-stream tasks. These activities also cover the development of the codebase and implementation of small-scale experiments. A minor portion (up to 10%) of the budget may be allocated for the acquisition of computing resources for codebase development and small-scale experiments, though the primary source of computing resources for pretraining should be sought from external high-performance computing facilities such as EuroHPC or National centres. The proposal should describe convincingly the strategy to access these computing resources.
  • Fine-Tuning of Multimodal Foundation Models: The proposal should clearly detail the activities pursued to fine-tune the model for diverse downstream tasks demonstrating illustrative potential use-cases. The tasks' output may either be of a single modality or multimodality. Research activities should investigate innovative methodologies designed to bolster the interplay between different data modalities, thereby enhancing the overall performance of these models.
  • Testing and Evaluation: The proposal should detail the development of workflows, benchmarks, testing procedures, and pertinent tools for evaluating both foundation and fine-tuned models. Attention should be paid to the performance, transparency, bias, robustness, accuracy, and security of the models, through appropriate testing procedures (e.g., red teaming for safety and security), in compliance with the future AI Act.

Proposals should adopt a multidisciplinary research team, as appropriate, to cover all the above issues.

Proposals should adhere to Horizon Europe's guidelines regarding Open Science practices as well as the FAIR data principles. Open access should be provided to research outputs - including training datasets, software tools, model architecture and hyperparameters, as well as model weights - unless a legitimate interest or constraint applies. Additionally, proposals are encouraged to deliver results under open-source licenses.

All proposals are expected to embed mechanisms to assess and demonstrate progress (with qualitative and quantitative KPIs, benchmarking and progress monitoring, including participation to international evaluation contests, as well as illustrative application use-cases demonstrating concrete potential added value), and share communicable results with the European R&D community, through the AI-on-demand platform, and Common European data spaces, and if necessary other relevant digital resource platforms in order to enhance the European AI, Data and Robotics ecosystem through the sharing of results and best practice.

Proposals are also expected to dedicate tasks and resources to collaborate with and provide input to the open innovation challenge under HORIZON-CL4-2023-HUMAN-01-04. Research teams involved in the proposals are expected to participate in the respective Innovation Challenges.

This topic implements the co-programmed European Partnership on AI, data and robotics.

News flashes

2025-05-06

EVALUATION results

Published: 18.04.2024

Deadline: 18.09.2024

Available budget: EUR 72,500,000

The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:

HUMAN-03-01

HUMAN-03-02

HUMAN-03-03

HUMAN-03-04

Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)

27

131

23

2

Number of inadmissible proposals

0

0

0

0

Number of ineligible proposals

1

5

1

0

Number of above-threshold proposals

19

92

10

1

Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals

444,267,401.95 €

673,046,895.38 €

14,727,623.27 €

6,000,000 €

Number of proposals retained for funding

2

3

1

1

Number of proposals in the reserve list

1

1

1

0

Funding threshold

14.5

15

14.5

12.5

Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14

3

14

1

0

Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13

4

20

1

0

Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10

12

58

8

1

Summary of observer reports:

Observer report for topics HUMAN-03-01, 02 and 04:

Based on the achieved results the overall quality of the evaluation is rated as “very good”. The topics in this report were monitored by a team of two Independent Observers. The entire observation process was conducted remotely through analysis of documentation on the SEP system and consensus and panel meetings held in the video conferencing system (Cisco Webex). The Independent Observers (IO) verified that the procedures set out or referred to in the EU Funding & Tenders Online Manual are followed, drew the attention of Commission staff to any potential deficiencies; and compiled a report with findings and recommendations aiming to improve the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the evaluation process. Scale of the evaluation task as well as its complexity were challenging but within the boundaries of the professional and personal capacities of the experts who were invited to evaluate the proposals received in response to this Call. The exercise was very well prepared and managed excellently by the Call and Topic Coordinators and their teams. The Commission staff is to be commended for their professionalism during the exercise. The organisation and scheduling of evaluator briefings, and consensus meetings was carried out with considered efficiency and effectiveness. The Independent Observers are satisfied that the evaluation process conformed to the applicable rules and required standards. The evaluation process was fair, efficient, and effective and the throughput time of the evaluation process was good. The Commission staff is to be commended for the support provided to the observers during their task. procedures and tools were efficient, reliable and user-friendly. All evaluation procedures monitored by the observers were implemented in conformity with the applicable and agreed rules. All experts and involved actors adhered strictly to the guiding principles of independence, objectivity, accuracy, and consistency. No significant deviations have been observed or reported to the observers. The observers have given careful consideration to recommendations which were discussed during the checkpoint meeting with EU Staff. Based on observations the following recommendations can be derived:

  • The gender balance in the Experts pool still has room for improvement
  • Despite the time pressure, more regular breaks should be foreseen and planned for online meetings, especially for the second half or full day panel meetings.
  • Text highlighting should be a future feature of the SEP editor.
  • Although the scoring process has considerably improved by focussing on the wording first, applied procedures should be further strengthened and harmonised.
  • The efficiency of the consensus phase could be improved by returning to physical presence meetings to discuss proposals on site.
  • Observer report for topic HUMAN-03-03:

    The IO finds that the evaluation followed the applicable rules for the call, and that it was competently evaluated in a fair and equitable manner by the experts and continuously monitored by the Agency staff. The IO did not observe any event or activity that gave rise to specific concern that might have jeopardised the fairness of the evaluation. HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-03: 23 proposals were submitted; 1 proposal accepted for funding. The expert team evaluating the proposals were perfectly gender balanced and from the broadest possible national representation.

    We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.

    For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.

    2025-05-06

    PROPOSAL NUMBERS

    Call HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03 has closed on the 18/09/2024.

    183 proposals have been submitted.

    The breakdown per topic is:

  • HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-01: 27 proposals
  • HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-02: 131 proposals
  • HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-03: 23 proposals
  • HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-04: 2 proposals
  • Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in December 2024.

    2025-05-06

    To the applicants of topic HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-01:

    NB: With regards to the previous update on this topic and the fact that, due to a technical problem, the ownership control declaration (annex to be uploaded) was missing in the Portal Submission System, the Commission will exceptionally allow the submission of this annex at a later stage as needed and upon request.

    Be reassured that the assessment of the ownership control declaration will not affect the outcome of the evaluation. The evaluation will focus on the Application form (Part A) and Technical description (Part B), which need to be completed and submitted in the Portal Submission System by the established deadline of 18/09/2024 17:00 Brussels time.

    2025-05-06

    To the applicants of topic HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-01:

    Dear applicants,

    Please note that the mandatory annex ownership control declaration has been added to the Portal Submission System. It is now possible to submit the annex next to Part B application.

    The ownership control declaration annex must be filled in by project participants as part of the application. All declarations must be assembled by the coordinator and uploaded in a single file in the Portal Submission System.

    We apologise for the inconvenience caused.

    2024-05-14

    Dear applicant,

    Please note that there was an error in the Part B template available for download for this topic.

    The correct version is entitled “Standard Application Form (HE RIA and IA)”and indicates a page limit of45 pages.

    The correct version is the one now available in the submission system. Please make sure that you use the correct version before proceeding further in the drafting of your proposal.

    We apologise for the inconvenience.

    2024-04-24
    The submission session is now available for: HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-02(HORIZON-RIA), HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-03(HORIZON-CSA), HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-01(HORIZON-RIA), HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03-04(HORIZON-CSA)
    call topic details
    Call status: Closed
    Publication date: 2024-04-17 (1 year ago)
    Opening date: 2024-04-23 (1 year ago)
    Closing date: 2024-09-18 (7 months ago)
    Procedure: single-stage

    Budget: 50000000
    Expected grants: 2
    Contribution: 25000000 - 25000000
    News flashes

    This call topic has been appended 6 times by the EC with news.

    • 2025-05-06
      evaluation resultspublished: 18.04.2024d...
    • 2025-05-06
      proposal numbers call horizon-cl4-2024-h...
    • 2025-05-06
      to the applicants of topic horizon-cl4-2...
    • 2025-05-06
      to the applicants of topic horizon-cl4-2...
    • 2024-05-14
      dear applicant,please note that there wa...
    • 2024-04-24
      the submission session is now available...
    Call

    HORIZON-CL4-2024-HUMAN-03

    Call topics are often grouped together in a call. Sometimes this is for a thematic reason, but often it is also for practical reasons.

    There are 3 other topics in this call:

    Source information

    Showing the latest information. Found 5 versions of this call topic in the F&T portal.

    Information from

    • 2025-01-11_03-30-11
    • 2024-11-23_03-30-15
    • 2024-11-04_17-25-09
    • 2024-09-30_21-20-58
    • 2024-07-11_18-29-30

    Check the differences between the versions.

    Annotations (will be publicly visible when approved)

    You must be logged in to add annotations
    No annotations yet

    Events

    This is just a very first implementation, better visualisation coming

    Events are added by the ideal-ist NCP community and are hand-picked. If you would like to suggest an event, please contact idealist@ffg.at.

    Call topic timeline

    What phase of the topic timeline are we in? This timeline contains some suggestions on what are realistic actions you should or could take at this moment. The timeline is based on the information provided by the call topic.
    1. Work programme available

      - 1 year ago

      The call topics are published first in the Work Programme, which is available a while before the call opens. By following up the Work Programme publications, you can get a headstart.

    2. Publication date

      - 1 year ago

      The call was published on the Funding & Tenders Portal.

    3. Opening date

      - 1 year ago

      The call opened for submissions.

    4. Closing date

      - 7 months ago

      Deadline for submitting a project.

    5. Time to inform applicants Estimate

      - 2 months ago

      The maximum time to inform applicants (TTI) of the outcome of the evaluation is five months from the call closure date.

    6. Today

    7. Sign grant agreement Estimate

      - 1 week from now

      The maximum time to sign grant agreements (TTG) is three months from the date of informing applicants.

    Funded Projects

    Loading...

    Project information comes from CORDIS (for Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe) and will be sourced from F&T Portal (for Digital Europe projects)

    Bubbles

    This call topic is part of: