Community-led actions to restore our ocean, seas and waters
Call text (as on F&T portal)
View on F&T portalProject results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:
- Demonstration of measurable, verifiable and ambitious progress towards reaching one or several interlinked objectives and targets of the Mission “Restore our Ocean and Waters by 2030”, as set out in the Mission Implementation Plan[1] through implementation of effective and well-managed community-led pilot actions and other types of support to Mission communities of actors.
- A concrete contribution to support Member States/Associated countries, their national, regional and/or local authorities, as well as all concerned stakeholders, to implement EU legislation related to marine and freshwater ecosystems[2] and reach the biodiversity, pollution and climate targets of the European Green Deal.
- Mobilised and engaged Mission communities of actors (regions, ports, cities, islands, etc.) through effective support designed to accelerate the progress to achieve the Mission objectives and targets;
- Leveraging of resources and investments from communities of actors to restore our ocean, seas and waters.
- Increased readiness at local level to deploy at scale innovative solutions to restore the ocean, seas and waters.
As stated in the Mission Ocean and Waters Implementation Plan, the deployment and upscaling phase (phase 2 of the Mission starting in 2026) aims to “enable broad participation in the Mission across the EU” with “a strong citizen, stakeholder and community governance element”. In the second phase of the Mission implementation, the solutions developed and piloted in the first phase (development and piloting phase) to deliver on the Mission and Green Deal objectives will be further deployed, replicated, and scaled up. Therefore, in the last years of phase 1, a transition to the deployment and upscaling phase needs to be well prepared.
Reaching the ambitious Mission objectives and targets is dependent on mobilising a broad set of actors to take meaningful action to restore our ocean, seas and waters. Practical, easily accessible support is needed for established or emerging communities of actors to facilitate the deployment at scale of innovative actions, measures and initiatives contributing to the EU Mission’s objectives, and the transformations required at national, regional, and local level.
Each proposed action under this topic should address one of the four basins covered by the Mission 'Restore our ocean and waters by 2030'[3] and should foresee all of the following types of support to Mission communities of actors of the respective basin: financial support to third parties (also referred to as cascading grants) to community-led pilot actions; cascading grants for transition agendas; and technical assistance, to be provided by the consortium.
Cascading grants to community-led pilot actions
Each proposal under this topic should foresee awarding at least 5 cascading grants of EUR 200 000 - EUR 2 million[4] per grant to community-led pilot actions that are implementing innovative solutions towards achieving one or several interlinked Mission objectives in the respective basin addressed by the proposal. The Commission estimates that the total budget for the cascading call to support community-led actions could be in the order of EUR 7 million. These third-party community-led actions may be implemented by a consortium of several participants. The size of the consortium and the budget requested should reflect the specific local needs addressed by the third-party action.
The proposals must ensure that the selection process of the third parties to which financial support would be granted is based on principles of transparency, objectivity and fairness, in accordance with Annex B of the general annexes to this work programme.
The proposals are expected to provide a detailed plan for the cascading grant call for the community-led pilot actions, in particular planning the launch of the call no later than the end of month 3 of the project. The proposals should describe appropriate means to promote the cascading grant call at lighthouse, national and regional levels that would allow them to reach as many of the potential applicants as possible.
The third-party actions supported through the cascading call should demonstrate measurable, verifiable, and ambitious progress towards reaching at least one or, whenever possible and applicable, several interlinked objectives and targets set out in the Mission Ocean and Waters Implementation Plan. The chosen focus of the third-party actions should depend on which objective(s) are most urgent for the communities dealing with specific conditions and realities in a particular area. However, addressing several objectives, in the case that this is feasible, may provide an added value and should thus be seen as advantage for the applications in the cascading calls.
The third-party actions should focus on implementing innovative solutions that go beyond the state of the art and that combine, as appropriate, technological, nature-based, social, cultural, regulatory, and financial innovation, and new governance models. The actions should foster a participatory approach that empowers local stakeholders, builds on their local know-how and application of sustainable practices, and encourages their long-term commitment to the protection, restoration and de-pollution of our ocean, seas and waters and to making the sustainable blue economy carbon-neutral and circular. With the help from the project consortia selected under this topic, the community-led third-party actions should promote the deployment and upscaling of innovative solutions to restore the ocean and waters, including through the preparation of deployment plans.
The community-led third-party actions should be encouraged to cooperate with scientific institutions to stimulate transdisciplinary innovation activities, which are based on best available science practices. Transdisciplinary activities denote cooperation of diverse societal stakeholder groups (administration, civil society, business & industry, finance, etc.), not only across academic disciplines (‘interdisciplinary’).
These community-led actions should also consider an effective contribution of SSH (Social Sciences and Humanities) disciplines as well as the inclusion of relevant SSH expertise, in order to produce meaningful and significant effects enhancing the societal impact of the related innovation activities. Social innovation should also be considered in order to match innovative ideas with social needs.
The proposals should encourage the third-party actions to build on research and innovation developed by projects financed under the current and/or previous EU framework programmes and other relevant EU and national programmes, linking also to the Mission Implementation Platform[5], and where applicable, make use of Copernicus/Galileo/EGNOS and Emodnet.
Attracting additional financing from Structural Funds or any national, regional, local programmes or private funding at any stage of the community-led pilot actions is strongly encouraged.
The types of Mission communities relevant to the cascading grants may include at least the following:
- ports (including inland ports);
- islands;
- fishing communities, aquaculture producers and other representatives of blue economy;
- operators of various vessels;
- Local Action Groups described by the Community-Led Local Development strategies[6]
- waterfront cities or regions / communities (avoiding overlaps with Cities’ Mission);
- conservation communities;
- representatives of the tourism sector;
- maritime infrastructure operators (incl. offshore platforms and their operators).
Various types of actors in the communities listed above could apply for the support. These could include for example:
- regional and local authorities;
- NGOs, foundations, professional associations, and other entities engaged in local development and nature conservation activities;
- educational establishments;
- locally based companies (provided this is not in conflict with the State Aid rules);
- research performing organisations, etc.
Cascading grants for transition agendas
Each proposed action should also foresee awarding at least 20 cascading grants for transition agendas of up to EUR 100 000 each, addressing the types of Mission communities described above. The proposed actions should ensure that the selection process of the third parties to which financial support for transition agendas would be granted is based on principles of transparency, objectivity, and fairness, in accordance with Annex B of the general annexes to this work programme.
A transition agenda for this call is understood as a strategic roadmap towards reaching all objectives and targets of the Mission 'Restore our ocean and waters by 2030' in the applicant communities, with a particular focus on the objectives that are most relevant to the specific community. The roadmaps could cover processes needed to ensure the protection and restoration of marine/coastal/inland waters, biodiversity and ecosystems, the reduction/elimination of pollution and the achievement of decarbonisation and circularity targets, as well as include a plan for a defined number of years concerning the objectives set, covering, for example, expected outcomes, results, impact, ways to achieve them and ways to bring in financing to support the achievement of these objectives.
The transition agenda should indicate how specific results and ideally also their impacts are expected to materialise in order to ensure the actual achievements of the objectives. These agendas would serve as a basis for further planning of follow-up activities by the actors involved, particularly actions to meet the Mission Ocean and Waters objectives/targets, to be subsequently implemented with the financial support of various funds (e.g., EU structural funds/national/regional funds).
All entities establishing transition agendas should commit to report to the project that had issued the third-party financing within 6 months after finalisation of the agendas on the progress of implementing its results in practice.
Technical assistance to Mission Communities of actors
The proposals should also foresee technical assistance to Mission Communities of actors in the basin addressed by the respective action. Such assistance should address the needs of the Mission communities of actors in the particular basin and may include support and advice needed for the preparation of business plans, feasibility studies, impact assessments, and needs assessment, as well as long-term sustainability planning to help the communities of actors develop sustainable financing strategies to ensure longevity of the efforts to achieve healthy oceans, seas and waters; capacity building to empower communities of actors with the knowledge and skills needed to undertake effective pollution prevention and elimination, conservation and restoration initiatives, as well as making the sustainable blue economy carbon-neutral and circular; and other Mission-related actions that would require direct counselling, written guidance, online materials, webinars, in-depths sessions, deep dives, peer-to-peer support, twinning etc.).
It is essential to tailor the support provided to the specific needs and context of each community of actors, including through the use of local languages, as well as fostering a participatory approach that empowers local stakeholders and encourages their long-term commitment to the protection and restoration of our ocean, seas and waters.
The proposals under this topic should also work on clustering of and support to the third-party community-led actions. The proposals should help create a network of these community-led actions to enhance communication, collaboration and sharing of knowledge and best practices to maximise their combined impact, and create links to the networks similarly created by the other three projects selected under this topic in other Mission lighthouse areas.
Furthermore, the proposals should assist each community-led action in using its experiences and solutions to establish new networks and collaborations in their respective areas. The proposals should provide guidance and support to the third-party actions in forming partnerships with local communities, NGOs, government agencies, or relevant stakeholders to expand the impact of the actions and create a collaborative ecosystem for knowledge sharing, resource optimisation, and wider adoption of successful solutions.
The proposals should provide help and guidance to the selected community-led actions regarding access to additional funding. The proposals should also identify, evaluate, and showcase feasible and scalable solutions demonstrated by the community-led actions, and provide guidance on deployment of these solutions.
Furthermore, the proposals should set aside funds for clustering and collaboration among four projects selected under this topic, including for a joint monitoring and evaluation framework to track the progress of each third-party community-led action project and assess their collective impact.
In order to ensure complementarities and avoid overlaps concerning the provision of all three types of support described above, the proposals should work closely with other Horizon Europe projects, particularly Prep4Blue, the relevant Mission lighthouse CSA projects (EcoDaLLi[7], BlueMissionAA[8], BlueMissionMed[9], BlueMissionBANOS[10]), the project selected under HORIZON-MISS-2024-OCEAN-02-02, the public procurement prepared under Other Actions of WP 2022 “Studies to support communities of actors to achieve the EU Mission: Restore our Ocean and Waters objectives”, and the Mission Implementation Platform (MIP), notably with the work MIP does on deployment and upscaling of solutions. The proposals may also collaborate with and build on the experience of relevant existing networks, partnerships and initiatives[11], as well as take into account relevant strategic research and innovation agendas and regional strategies.
The projects resulting from this call should be implemented in close collaboration with the relevant EC service(s) and the Mission Ocean and Waters Secretariat[12] to ensure a coherent and timely implementation of the Mission.
Proposals should be flexible enough to accommodate for some adjustments that may be requested by the Commission before the grant agreement signature to ensure complementarity of activities between the lighthouse CSA projects, Prep4Blue, the Mission Implementation Platform, and the project selected under topic HORIZON-MISS-2024-OCEAN-02-02.
[1] See pages 12-13 of the Mission Ocean and Waters Implementation Plan: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-09/ocean_and_waters_implementation_plan_for_publication.pdf
[2] The Birds, Habitats, Marine Strategy Framework and Water Framework Directives
[3] The four basins covered by the Mission ’Restore our ocean and waters by 2030’: 1. Danube river basin, 2. Atlantic and Arctic sea basin, 3. Mediterranean Sea basin, 4. Baltic and North Sea basin
[4] This range of funding refers to the amount awarded as a cascading grant to a community-led action (third-party action) which we envision to be implemented by a consortium of several participants (third parties). Please note that this is different from the specific condition concerning Legal and financial set-up of the Grant Agreements, where the stipulated maximum amount applies to each individual third party (please see the relevant footnote under the specific conditions).
[5] Mission Ocean and Waters service portal | Research and Innovation (europa.eu)
[9] https://bluemissionmed.eu/
[10] https://bluemissionbanos.eu/
[11] These could include networks and initiatives such as BIOEAST (https://bioeast.eu/), AAORIA (https://allatlanticocean.org/), BlueMed Initiative (http://www.bluemed-initiative.eu/ ), etc
[12] Mission secretariat consisting of European Commission staff, is located within the European Commission services and is managed by the Mission Manager, for details on Mission governance see Commission Decision C(2021) 4472 final of 24.06.2021.
News flashes
Please note that the specific condition on the procedure: “Evaluation carried out by EU staff” should be interpreted to mean “Evaluation committee partially composed of EU representatives” in accordance with Article 29(1) of the HE Regulation and by extension General Annex F of the General Annexes.
17 proposals have been submitted under this call. The results of the evaluations are expected to be released by end of December 2024.
Following several topic updates published on the Funding and Tenders Portal for HORIZON-MISS-2024-OCEAN-02-01, please be informed that the call deadline has been extended to 1st of October 2024 (17:00 Brussels time). In case you submitted your application, please check again the alignment with the clarifications published and re-submit your proposal.
We regret any inconvenience that might has been created and wish you a lot of success with your application.
Please note that “Other cost category (Financial Support to Third Parties, FSTP)” is missing from budget table in PART A of the submission forms. Works are in progress to correct the topic configuration and unhide the FSTP column. You will be promptly informed when the issue is resolved. It is recommended to postpone submissions until after the correction of the budget table.
Q: Can NCPs (National Contact Points) participate as beneficiaries in Horizon Europe projects?
A: At the Info Day where this topic was presented, the question was raised whether Horizon Europe or Mission NCPs can participate as beneficiaries in this topic. In this regard it should be pointed out, that for NCPs it is important to avoid situations that could later give rise to potential conflicts of interest, particularly where the host organisation of a NCP may itself become an applicant in a proposal or use its NCP status to gain or grant undue advantage. To this end, all NCPs upon nomination have confirmed to DG RTD in writing that they have read and accepted the Minimum Standards and guiding principles for setting up systems of National Contact Points (NCP systems) under Horizon Europe, and in particular the sections on confidentiality and avoidance of conflict of interest (7. Confidentiality and 8. Conflict of Interest).
Accordingly, we would like to underline that in line with section 8, letter d) “An NCP must not participate in a proposal or in a project in relation to the work programme part where it provides NCP services, unless, in exceptional circumstances, the Commission allows such participation, due to the specific nature of a given call (e.g. , European Partnerships, dedicated CSAs for transnational cooperation between NCPs or collaboration between research funders).”
Participation, according to section 8, letter c) of the Minimum Standards means: “[…] In this context “participation in a proposal or in a project” means a named NCP identified as either carrying out the R&I activities, or in an advisory or supporting role (e.g. project advisory board). NCPs, acting in that capacity, shall not provide letters of support or similar documents in relation to specific proposals.”
It should also be reminded that according to section 8, letter e) of the minimum Standards separate provisions apply when an host organisations of NCPs act as an applicant and in the case NCPs participate in a proposal or in a project in relation to a work programme part other than the one where they provide NCPs services.
These provisions are included in the Minimum Standards to avoid the situation of NCPs receiving on the one hand from the Commission “[…] in-time general and specialist in-depth information for the appropriate performance of the NCPs at the earliest(7) on: […] b. Roadmaps, work programmes and upcoming calls;” – Footnote (7) “Before the release to the general public when possible.” In addition to the information that they receive from the potential applicants they assist, and on the other hand making use of this “privileged” information to gain undue competitive advantage over other applicants, if they apply.
Concerning the consequences for the breach of these provisions, according to the final paragraph of section 8 of the Minimum Standards “[…] Non-compliance may also lead to the consequences set in Articles 136 and 141 of the Financial Regulation (e.g. exclusion or rejection of a person or entity from participating in an award procedure or in an application/action).”
This means concretely potential consequences both for the NCPs themselves (e.g. “de-recognition” according to section 6 of the Minimum Standards and exclusion according to Article 136 of the Financial Regulation) and for the proposals with the rejection of the participant who was previously involved in the preparation of award procedure documents (e.g. the Work Programme) where this entails a breach of the principle of equality of treatment, including distortion of competition, that cannot be remedied otherwise, according to Article 141(1)(c) of the Financial Regulation.
Therefore, for the reasons explained above and to avoid consequences both for the NCPs and for the proposals, it is recommended that NCPs providing services to this part of the work programme (i.e. EU Missions) are not participating in this Call.
In case of doubt, the NCPs are kindly requested to use the channels communicated to them in order to contact the relevant DG R&I service.
Q: Which are the ‘Mission community actors’ eligible for financial support?
A: ‘Mission community actors’ are defined broadly and could be various types of individuals, public or private sector entities or other actors, located in Member States and Associated Countries, as long as they are proposing activities contributing clearly to the Mission objectives.
Q: From which countries should beneficiaries come from for the purpose of the additional condition requiring the consortium to include beneficiaries from at least two regions294 or associations thereof from the respective lighthouse area?
A: Since the Mission Ocean and Waters Implementation Plan defines basins as “larger naturally, economically, societally, culturally and politically interconnected areas comprising multiple regions (as administrative entities) and extending over multiple Member States or associated countries along a river, or a sea’”, only regions of Member States and/or Associates Countries or associations including such regions shall be considered for the geographical delimitation of the respective lighthouse areas. This means that, in addition to the standard eligibility conditions described in General Annex B, the consortium must include as beneficiaries at least two regions from the respective lighthouse areas in Member States and/or Associates Countries or associations thereof. Provided that the conditions on the minimum consortium composition are met, any legal entity, regardless of its place of establishment, is eligible to participate.
Q: What is the definition of ‘associations thereof’ in the condition ‘the consortium must include beneficiaries from at least two regions or associations thereof from the respective lighthouse area’?
A: In the context of topic HORIZON-MISS-2024-OCEAN-02-01, ‘associations thereof’ refers to ‘associations of at least two regions’. It concerns a group of two or more regions registered as members of an association whose scope of activity falls within one of the eligible basins.
Q: Who should be a beneficiary for the purpose of the additional condition requiring the consortium to include beneficiaries from at least two regions294 or associations thereof from the respective lighthouse area?
A: Beneficiaries should be either 1) regions represented by the relevant public authorities, or 2) associations of the regions
Q: What is the definition of ‘regions’?
A: In the context the topic HORIZON-MISS-2024-OCEAN-02-01, ‘regions’ refers to geographical areas at sub-national level, defined as NUTS 2 and 3, corresponding to actual administrative units with their own representation/government: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/nuts/overview
Opening date: 2024-04-23 (2 years ago)
Closing date: 2024-10-01 (2 years ago)
Procedure: single-stage
Budget: 50,000,000
Expected grants: 4
Contribution: 12,500,000 - 12,500,000
This call topic has been appended 11 times by the EC with news.
-
2026-04-21
please note that the specific condition... -
2026-04-21
17 proposals have been submitted under t... -
2026-04-21
following several topic updates publishe... -
2026-04-21
please note that “other cost category (f... -
2026-04-21
q: can ncps (national contact points) pa... -
2026-04-21
q: which are the ‘mission community acto... -
2026-04-21
q: from which countries should beneficia... -
2026-04-21
q: what is the definition of ‘associatio... -
2026-04-21
q: who should be a beneficiary for the p... -
2026-04-21
q: what is the definition of ‘regions’?a... -
2024-05-07
the submission session is now available...
HORIZON-MISS-2024-OCEAN-02
Call topics are often grouped together in a call. Sometimes this is for a thematic reason, but often it is also for practical reasons.
There is 1 other topic in this call:
Showing the latest information. Found 5 versions of this call topic in the F&T portal.
Information from
- 2025-07-02_03-33-00
- 2024-11-23_03-30-15
- 2024-11-04_17-25-09
- 2024-09-30_21-20-58
- 2024-07-11_18-29-26
Check the differences between the versions.
Annotations
Events
Hand-picked events relevant to this call topic.
No events yet
There are currently no events linked to this call topic.
Timeline
Grant agreement signed · 01 Jun 2025 (1 year ago)
All expected milestones for this call have passed.
Work programme published
18 Feb 2024 · est.
Call opens
23 Apr 2024
Call published
30 Sep 2024
Call closes
01 Oct 2024
Outcome expected
01 Mar 2025 · est.
Grant agreement signed
01 Jun 2025 · est.
-
Work programme published Estimated
18 Feb 2024 · 2 years ago
Topics are listed in the Work Programme before the call opens. Spotting this early gives you a head start on partner search and proposal planning.
-
Call opens
23 Apr 2024 · 2 years ago
Submissions can be made from this date.
-
Call published
30 Sep 2024 · 2 years ago
This topic was first published in TopicTree.
-
Call closes
01 Oct 2024 · 2 years ago
Deadline to submit a proposal.
-
Outcome expected Estimated
01 Mar 2025 · 1 year ago
The maximum time to inform applicants of the evaluation outcome is five months after the call closes.
-
Grant agreement signed Estimated
01 Jun 2025 · 1 year ago
The maximum time to sign the grant agreement is three months after applicants are informed of the outcome.
Funded Projects
Loading...
Project information comes from CORDIS (for Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe) and will be sourced from F&T Portal (for Digital Europe projects)
Ecosystem bubbles
This call topic is part of the following thematic bubbles.