Implementing research infrastructure technology roadmaps
Call text (as on F&T portal)
View on F&T portalExpected Outcome:
Project results are expected to contribute to several of the following expected outcomes:
- enhanced scientific and technological competitiveness of European research infrastructures;
- enhanced research infrastructure capacities to address research challenges and EU policy priorities;
- increased technological level of European industries through the co-development of advanced technologies for research infrastructures and creation of potential new markets;
- increased availability of research infrastructure component manufacturing capabilities currently not available in Europe;
- long-term integration of research infrastructures into local, regional and global research and innovation ecosystems;
- strengthened foundations for the development of innovative companies in Europe.
Scope:
Research infrastructures require constant technology development to maintain and upgrade their services and to create new ones, to keep pace with the advancements of research and meet the requirements of emerging user communities from academia and innovation ecosystems. The manufacturing capacity of industry, including SMEs, is often required for this, and the co-creation of technological components is a defining feature of many research infrastructures. In some cases, manufacturing capabilities are lacking inside the EU, putting Europe's technological sovereignty at stake.
Several research infrastructure and technology communities, such as the accelerator, light source, or astronomy communities, have already developed research infrastructure technology roadmaps that identify key components necessary to maintain Europe's leading position in research infrastructure technologies.
Projects should implement significant parts of, or entire existing research infrastructure technology roadmaps through co-creation with industrial partners from the earliest possible stage. The technology roadmaps should be the result of a community or cross-community effort already undertaken, and they should not be the result of an isolated effort, e.g., of a single research infrastructure. The technological solutions developed should respond to the needs of several research infrastructures, and in some cases the needs of different types of research infrastructures.
Proposals are expected to involve research infrastructures and industrial partners, including SMEs, or other technological partners, to promote innovation and knowledge sharing through co-creation of required technological solutions and, when appropriate, make use of large-scale platforms combining R&D, integration and validation for technological developments. While industry, including SMEs, or other technological partners do not need to be consortium members, proposals should show evidence of their commitment via engagement letters or other forms of endorsement. If applicable, proposals should describe how such partners will be identified in the course of the action.
Furthermore, proposals should contribute to fostering the innovation potential of research infrastructures by reinforcing the partnership with industry, through e.g. transfer of knowledge and other dissemination activities.
Proposals should address the following aspects as well:
- development of identified fundamental technologies or techniques underpinning and arising from the efficient and joint use of the involved research infrastructures, taking into account resource efficiency (e.g. raw material and energy consumption) and environmental (including climate-related) impacts.
- prototyping of high-performance methodologies, protocols, and instrumentation, including the testing of components, subsystems, materials, and dedicated software, needed to upgrade the involved research infrastructures, construct their next generation, or develop new advanced applications.
Beneficiaries may provide financial support to third parties. The support to third parties can only be provided in the form of grants. Given the type of action (e.g. limited number of choices in specific technology fields) and its level of ambition, the maximum amount that can be granted to each third party may exceed the standard limit of EUR 60 000 if duly justified in the proposal.
Proposals may also include Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) subcontracting activities. This option encourages the use of public procurements for the competitive development of new specific solutions, whilst opening market opportunities for industry, including SMEs, and researchers active in Europe. By establishing the procurement process in consecutive phases, the PCP activity can support the development of competing designs, prototypes, and solution testing. This ensures that investment risks do not prevent tackling specific scientific and technological issues and allows to approach a problem from different angles and to test different solutions.
When appropriate, proposals should also build on results from past/ongoing projects such as the ones funded under Horizon 2020 topics INFRAINNOV-03-2020 and INFRAINNOV-04-2020, and under Horizon Europe topics HORIZON-INFRA-2022-TECH-01-01 and HORIZON-INFRA-2024-TECH-01-01 and avoid overlap with them.
News flashes
EVALUATION results
Published: 15.05.2025
Deadline: 18.09.2025
Available budget: EUR million 400.50
The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:
Evaluation results
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-01
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-02
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-03
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-04
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-05
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-01
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-02
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-03
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-04
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-05
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-01
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-02
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-03
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-04
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-01
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-02
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-03
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-04
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
16
11
20
1
4
6
8
4
4
12
5
4
2
15
7
15
5
20
Number of inadmissible proposals
1
2
Number of ineligible proposals
1
Number of above-threshold proposals
11
11
16
1
3
5
7
2
4
11
5
3
2
15
6
15
5
13
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals
15,38
15,94
61,45
3,00
4,47
41,50
54,40
14,99
31,98
99,94
50,45
14,99
19,65
74,16
30,47
155,15
46,86
123,15
Number of proposals retained for funding
8
11
7
1
3
4
2
2
1
4
3
3
2
4
5
6
3
4
Number of proposals in the reserve list
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
1
Funding threshold[1],[2]
12,50[2]
12,00[2]
13,50
12,50
13[2]
12,00
15,00
10,00
15,00
14,00
12,00[2]
12,5[2]
12,00[2]
13,00[2]
13,00
13,50
12,50
13,00
Ranking distribution
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
3
3
3
0
2
2
3
0
2
4
2
0
0
5
3
5
0
1
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
3
3
9
0
1
1
3
1
1
2
0
2
0
3
2
2
2
3
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
5
5
4
1
0
2
1
1
1
5
3
1
2
7
1
8
3
9
1 Proposals with the same score were ranked according to the priority order procedure set out in the call conditions (for HE, in the General Annexes to the Work Programme or specific arrangements in the specific call/topic conditions).
2 According to the specific condition of :
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-01 to ensure a balanced portfolio coverage, grants are awarded “To ensure a balanced portfolio covering a wide range of domains, grants will be awarded to applications not only in order of ranking but at least also to those proposals that are the highest ranked within each domain, provided that the applications attain all thresholds.”.
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-02 to ensure a balanced portfolio coverage, grants are awarded “To ensure a balanced coverage of the targeted ESFRI Projects, grants will be awarded to applications not only in order of ranking but at least also to those proposals that are the highest ranked for each targeted ESFRI Project, provided that the applications attain all thresholds.”.
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-05 to ensure a balanced portfolio coverage, grants are awarded “To ensure a balanced portfolio covering the different areas, grants will be awarded to applications not only in order of ranking but at least also to those proposals that are the highest ranked within each area, provided that the applications attain all thresholds.”.
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-01 to ensure a balanced portfolio coverage, grants are awarded “To ensure a balanced portfolio covering the different areas, grants will be awarded to applications not only in order of ranking but at least also to those proposals that are the highest ranked within each area, provided that the applications attain all thresholds.”.
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-02 to ensure a balanced portfolio coverage, grants are awarded “To ensure a balanced portfolio covering the different areas, grants will be awarded to applications not only in order of ranking but at least also to those proposals that are the highest ranked within each area, provided that the applications attain all thresholds.”.
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-03 to ensure a balanced portfolio coverage, grants are awarded “To ensure a balanced portfolio covering the different areas, grants will be awarded to applications not only in order of ranking but at least also to those proposals that are the highest ranked within each area, provided that the applications attain all thresholds.”.
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-04 to ensure a balanced portfolio coverage, grants are awarded “To ensure a balanced portfolio covering as many scientific domains for service provision as possible, grants will be awarded to applications not only in order of ranking but also to proposals that address a scientific domain (and sub-domain if needed) not covered by a higher ranked proposal, provided that the proposals attain all thresholds”.
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
Summary of observer report:
The evaluation of the HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01 call was carried out in accordance with established Horizon Europe procedures and demonstrated a high level of transparency, fairness, and procedural integrity. The call covered 18 topics across four destinations and involved the assessment of 159 submitted proposals, of which 155 were found to be eligible and admissible.
The evaluation was implemented through a fully remote process, comprising individual expert assessments, consensus report preparation, virtual consensus meetings, and online panel meetings. All key milestones were respected, and the overall duration of the process was efficient. The observer did not identify any indications that the compact duration of the evaluation had a negative impact on the quality, robustness, or transparency of the assessments.
Throughout all phases, REA placed strong and consistent emphasis on procedural transparency, equal treatment of proposals, and the independence of expert judgement. Comprehensive briefing materials, structured evaluation support tools, and consistent moderation practices supported a coherent and well-calibrated application of the evaluation criteria across topics. Project and Programme Officers and moderators fulfilled a clearly facilitative role, ensuring structured deliberations without influencing the substance of expert discussions.
Conflicts of interest were managed in a systematic and rigorous manner, with all identified cases duly declared and handled in line with the applicable rules. Confidentiality requirements were repeatedly reinforced during evaluation activities, and no breaches of confidentiality, impartiality, or compliance with the rules were observed.
Overall, the observer concludes that the evaluation of HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01 was conducted in full conformity with the applicable rules and guidance documents, providing a sound, credible, and transparent basis for the selection and ranking of proposals in line with the objectives of the Research Infrastructures Work Programme.
PROPOSAL NUMBERS
Call HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01 has closed on 18/09/2025.
159 proposals have been submitted.
The breakdown per topic is:
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-01: 16 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-02: 11 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-03: 20 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-04: 1 proposal
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-05: 4 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-01: 6 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-02: 8 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-03: 4 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-04: 4 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-05: 12 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-01: 5 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-02: 4 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-03: 2 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-04: 15 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-01: 7 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-02: 15 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-03: 5 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-04: 20 proposals
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in Feb. 2026.
Opening date: 2025-05-06 (1 year ago)
Closing date: 2025-09-18 (1 year ago)
Procedure: single-stage
Budget: 45,000,000
Expected grants: 4
Contribution: 10,000,000 - 10,000,000
This call topic has been appended 4 times by the EC with news.
-
2026-10-15
evaluation resultspublished: 15.05.2025d... -
2026-10-15
summary of observer report:the evaluatio... -
2026-10-15
proposal numbers call horizon-infra-202... -
2026-10-15
the submission session is now available...
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01
Call topics are often grouped together in a call. Sometimes this is for a thematic reason, but often it is also for practical reasons.
There are 17 other topics in this call:
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-01
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-02
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-03
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-04
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-05
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-01
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-02
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-03
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-04
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-05
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-01
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-02
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-03
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-04
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-01
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-03
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-04
Showing the latest information. Found 7 versions of this call topic in the F&T portal.
Information from
- 2026-02-12_06-41-11
- 2026-02-11_06-40-35
- 2025-10-28_15-48-07
- 2025-07-02_03-31-41
- 2025-06-27_03-31-25
- 2025-06-07_03-30-55
- 2025-05-16_03-30-38
Check the differences between the versions.
Annotations
Events
Hand-picked events relevant to this call topic.
No events yet
There are currently no events linked to this call topic.
Timeline
Grant agreement signed · 18 May 2026 (4 months ago)
All expected milestones for this call have passed.
Work programme published
06 Mar 2025 · est.
Call opens
06 May 2025
Call published
16 May 2025
Call closes
18 Sep 2025
Outcome expected
18 Feb 2026 · est.
Grant agreement signed
18 May 2026 · est.
-
Work programme published Estimated
06 Mar 2025 · 1 year ago
Topics are listed in the Work Programme before the call opens. Spotting this early gives you a head start on partner search and proposal planning.
-
Call opens
06 May 2025 · 1 year ago
Submissions can be made from this date.
-
Call published
16 May 2025 · 1 year ago
This topic was first published in TopicTree.
-
Call closes
18 Sep 2025 · 1 year ago
Deadline to submit a proposal.
-
Outcome expected Estimated
18 Feb 2026 · 7 months ago
The maximum time to inform applicants of the evaluation outcome is five months after the call closes.
-
Grant agreement signed Estimated
18 May 2026 · 4 months ago
The maximum time to sign the grant agreement is three months after applicants are informed of the outcome.
Funded Projects
Loading...
Project information comes from CORDIS (for Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe) and will be sourced from F&T Portal (for Digital Europe projects)
Ecosystem bubbles
This call topic is part of the following thematic bubbles.
Not part of a bubble yet
This call topic has not been grouped into an ecosystem bubble.