EOSC Nodes with federating capabilities for the EOSC Federation
Call text (as on F&T portal)
View on F&T portalExpected Outcome:
Project results are expected to contribute to the following outcomes:
- The EOSC federation will be established as a distributed system of systems, comprising of independently managed EOSC nodes that collaborate to augment their contribution to EOSC users whilst ensuring resilience of the interconnected systems by supporting the common federating capabilities.
- Researchers will benefit from unified support aimed at integrating their research environments with the EOSC federation and this coordinated assistance will streamline the alignment of research practices with the EOSC ecosystem.
Scope:
The call aims to further develop the cross-domain EOSC system of systems, building upon the results of the previous INFRAEOSC calls[1]. The focus is on developing and expanding the EOSC federation through a network of nodes as baseline elements of the federation model. These EOSC nodes will establish a set of essential federating capabilities, compatible with the EOSC EU Node reference architecture, following the EOSC Federation Handbook and EOSC interoperability framework. They should have a clearly described identity and offer unique value to EOSC users, for example representing a specific thematic domain (e.g. data or computing) or geographical area amongst the Horizon Europe participating and associated countries.
To become an EOSC node, the proposals are expected to demonstrate the ability to assess and address the existing gaps regarding the federating capabilities at technical, legal and organisational level. The proposals are expected to indicate adherence to the EOSC governance structure, federation policies and capabilities. They should also address business models, service management procedures, and technical and semantic interoperability. Furthermore, the proposals should propose a credible plan to ensure the sustainability of the proposed solutions beyond the project lifespan, including how to take over or replicate the federating role currently ensured by the EOSC EU Node[2].
More specifically, the proposals should focus on all of the following aspects:
- Satisfy the minimal node requirements as defined by the EOSC tripartite governance[3], and go beyond them by further development and refinement of the harmonized participation model, taking into account the variety of thematic and national dimensions in the EOSC federation. These requirements include:
- Compliance with the requirements on the legal status of the organisation;
- Compliance with the requirements aiming at large-scale, quality service provisioning;
- Capacity to onboard third-party services[4];
- Capacity to contribute to and/or take-over the EOSC federating capabilities;
- Adoption and integration of the EOSC federation rules and policies, and further refinement and practical adaptation of best practices;
- Support to effectively monitor and report the activities of the services provided.
- Integrate and offer EOSC core federating capabilities pioneered by the EOSC EU Node, such as Authentication, Authorisation and Accounting, Research Catalogues and Knowledge Graph, Application Workflows, Monitoring and Helpdesk
- Contribute to a robust and coordinated strategy for evolving and sustaining the federated governance model for EOSC by fostering effective collaboration and coordination among the other node operators offering federating capabilities. This can be done for example by distributing the work and taking a share in facilitating the identification, selection and integration/enrolment of other organisations interested in becoming responsible for operating an EOSC node and representing various countries, regions and scientific disciplines.
- Enrich the existing guidelines and best practices for the onboarding and enrolment processes.
- Evolve and refine the EOSC federation specifications to drive the evolution across governance, operations, sustainability and technical interoperability.
- Designate and train the EOSC node operators, especially those offering federating capabilities, for high level of responsibilities within the EOSC federation.
- Develop and run community engagement and support programmes around the EOSC nodes and the surrounding ecosystem.
null
Activities are expected to achieve TRL 7-8 by the end of the project – see General Annex B.
[2] https://open-science-cloud.ec.europa.eu/. Financial support for third-parties (FSTP), that will make value-added data, tools and services ready to be onboarded and available via the node, can be included in the proposals. The FSTP budget will only cover the cost of onboarding.
[4] Financial support for third-parties (FSTP), that will make value-added data, tools and services ready to be onboarded and available via the node, can be included in the proposals. The FSTP budget will only cover the cost of onboarding.
News flashes
EVALUATION results
Published: 15.05.2025
Deadline: 18.09.2025
Available budget: EUR million 400.50
The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:
Evaluation results
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-01
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-02
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-03
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-04
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-05
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-01
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-02
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-03
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-04
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-05
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-01
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-02
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-03
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-04
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-01
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-02
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-03
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-04
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
16
11
20
1
4
6
8
4
4
12
5
4
2
15
7
15
5
20
Number of inadmissible proposals
1
2
Number of ineligible proposals
1
Number of above-threshold proposals
11
11
16
1
3
5
7
2
4
11
5
3
2
15
6
15
5
13
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals
15,38
15,94
61,45
3,00
4,47
41,50
54,40
14,99
31,98
99,94
50,45
14,99
19,65
74,16
30,47
155,15
46,86
123,15
Number of proposals retained for funding
8
11
7
1
3
4
2
2
1
4
3
3
2
4
5
6
3
4
Number of proposals in the reserve list
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
1
Funding threshold[1],[2]
12,50[2]
12,00[2]
13,50
12,50
13[2]
12,00
15,00
10,00
15,00
14,00
12,00[2]
12,5[2]
12,00[2]
13,00[2]
13,00
13,50
12,50
13,00
Ranking distribution
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
3
3
3
0
2
2
3
0
2
4
2
0
0
5
3
5
0
1
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
3
3
9
0
1
1
3
1
1
2
0
2
0
3
2
2
2
3
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
5
5
4
1
0
2
1
1
1
5
3
1
2
7
1
8
3
9
1 Proposals with the same score were ranked according to the priority order procedure set out in the call conditions (for HE, in the General Annexes to the Work Programme or specific arrangements in the specific call/topic conditions).
2 According to the specific condition of :
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-01 to ensure a balanced portfolio coverage, grants are awarded “To ensure a balanced portfolio covering a wide range of domains, grants will be awarded to applications not only in order of ranking but at least also to those proposals that are the highest ranked within each domain, provided that the applications attain all thresholds.”.
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-02 to ensure a balanced portfolio coverage, grants are awarded “To ensure a balanced coverage of the targeted ESFRI Projects, grants will be awarded to applications not only in order of ranking but at least also to those proposals that are the highest ranked for each targeted ESFRI Project, provided that the applications attain all thresholds.”.
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-05 to ensure a balanced portfolio coverage, grants are awarded “To ensure a balanced portfolio covering the different areas, grants will be awarded to applications not only in order of ranking but at least also to those proposals that are the highest ranked within each area, provided that the applications attain all thresholds.”.
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-01 to ensure a balanced portfolio coverage, grants are awarded “To ensure a balanced portfolio covering the different areas, grants will be awarded to applications not only in order of ranking but at least also to those proposals that are the highest ranked within each area, provided that the applications attain all thresholds.”.
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-02 to ensure a balanced portfolio coverage, grants are awarded “To ensure a balanced portfolio covering the different areas, grants will be awarded to applications not only in order of ranking but at least also to those proposals that are the highest ranked within each area, provided that the applications attain all thresholds.”.
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-03 to ensure a balanced portfolio coverage, grants are awarded “To ensure a balanced portfolio covering the different areas, grants will be awarded to applications not only in order of ranking but at least also to those proposals that are the highest ranked within each area, provided that the applications attain all thresholds.”.
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-04 to ensure a balanced portfolio coverage, grants are awarded “To ensure a balanced portfolio covering as many scientific domains for service provision as possible, grants will be awarded to applications not only in order of ranking but also to proposals that address a scientific domain (and sub-domain if needed) not covered by a higher ranked proposal, provided that the proposals attain all thresholds”.
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
Summary of observer report:
The evaluation of the HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01 call was carried out in accordance with established Horizon Europe procedures and demonstrated a high level of transparency, fairness, and procedural integrity. The call covered 18 topics across four destinations and involved the assessment of 159 submitted proposals, of which 155 were found to be eligible and admissible.
The evaluation was implemented through a fully remote process, comprising individual expert assessments, consensus report preparation, virtual consensus meetings, and online panel meetings. All key milestones were respected, and the overall duration of the process was efficient. The observer did not identify any indications that the compact duration of the evaluation had a negative impact on the quality, robustness, or transparency of the assessments.
Throughout all phases, REA placed strong and consistent emphasis on procedural transparency, equal treatment of proposals, and the independence of expert judgement. Comprehensive briefing materials, structured evaluation support tools, and consistent moderation practices supported a coherent and well-calibrated application of the evaluation criteria across topics. Project and Programme Officers and moderators fulfilled a clearly facilitative role, ensuring structured deliberations without influencing the substance of expert discussions.
Conflicts of interest were managed in a systematic and rigorous manner, with all identified cases duly declared and handled in line with the applicable rules. Confidentiality requirements were repeatedly reinforced during evaluation activities, and no breaches of confidentiality, impartiality, or compliance with the rules were observed.
Overall, the observer concludes that the evaluation of HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01 was conducted in full conformity with the applicable rules and guidance documents, providing a sound, credible, and transparent basis for the selection and ranking of proposals in line with the objectives of the Research Infrastructures Work Programme.
PROPOSAL NUMBERS
Call HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01 has closed on 18/09/2025.
159 proposals have been submitted.
The breakdown per topic is:
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-01: 16 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-02: 11 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-03: 20 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-04: 1 proposal
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-05: 4 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-01: 6 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-02: 8 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-03: 4 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-04: 4 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-05: 12 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-01: 5 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-02: 4 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-03: 2 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-04: 15 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-01: 7 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-02: 15 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-03: 5 proposals
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-04: 20 proposals
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in Feb. 2026.
Opening date: 2025-05-06 (1 year ago)
Closing date: 2025-09-18 (1 year ago)
Procedure: single-stage
Budget: 30,000,000
Expected grants: 4
Contribution: 6,000,000 - 8,000,000
This call topic has been appended 4 times by the EC with news.
-
2026-10-15
evaluation resultspublished: 15.05.2025d... -
2026-10-15
summary of observer report:the evaluatio... -
2026-10-15
proposal numbers call horizon-infra-202... -
2026-10-15
the submission session is now available...
HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01
Call topics are often grouped together in a call. Sometimes this is for a thematic reason, but often it is also for practical reasons.
There are 17 other topics in this call:
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-01
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-02
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-03
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-04
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-DEV-05
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-02
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-03
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-04
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-EOSC-05
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-01
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-02
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-03
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-SERV-04
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-01
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-02
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-03
- HORIZON-INFRA-2025-01-TECH-04
Showing the latest information. Found 7 versions of this call topic in the F&T portal.
Information from
- 2026-02-12_06-41-14
- 2026-02-11_06-40-39
- 2025-10-28_15-48-02
- 2025-07-02_03-31-42
- 2025-06-27_03-31-25
- 2025-06-07_03-30-54
- 2025-05-16_03-30-38
Check the differences between the versions.
Annotations
Events
Hand-picked events relevant to this call topic.
No events yet
There are currently no events linked to this call topic.
Timeline
Grant agreement signed · 18 May 2026 (4 months ago)
All expected milestones for this call have passed.
Work programme published
06 Mar 2025 · est.
Call opens
06 May 2025
Call published
16 May 2025
Call closes
18 Sep 2025
Outcome expected
18 Feb 2026 · est.
Grant agreement signed
18 May 2026 · est.
-
Work programme published Estimated
06 Mar 2025 · 1 year ago
Topics are listed in the Work Programme before the call opens. Spotting this early gives you a head start on partner search and proposal planning.
-
Call opens
06 May 2025 · 1 year ago
Submissions can be made from this date.
-
Call published
16 May 2025 · 1 year ago
This topic was first published in TopicTree.
-
Call closes
18 Sep 2025 · 1 year ago
Deadline to submit a proposal.
-
Outcome expected Estimated
18 Feb 2026 · 7 months ago
The maximum time to inform applicants of the evaluation outcome is five months after the call closes.
-
Grant agreement signed Estimated
18 May 2026 · 4 months ago
The maximum time to sign the grant agreement is three months after applicants are informed of the outcome.
Funded Projects
Loading...
Project information comes from CORDIS (for Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe) and will be sourced from F&T Portal (for Digital Europe projects)
Ecosystem bubbles
This call topic is part of the following thematic bubbles.
Not part of a bubble yet
This call topic has not been grouped into an ecosystem bubble.