Approaches, verification and training for Edge-AI building blocks for CCAM Systems (CCAM Partnership)
Call text (as on F&T portal)
View on F&T portalExpected Outcome:
Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:
- CCAM solutions - in hardware and software - with reduced power consumption, latency, and improved speed and accuracy, as domain specific adaptions of sector agnostic advancements in e.g. AI and/or cloud-edge-IoT technologies;
- Enhanced levels of safety, (cyber) security, privacy and ethical standards of data-driven CCAM functionalities by using e.g. edge-AI applications for CCAM;
- Approaches for well-balanced distributions of AI calculations for expanding use cases (e.g. collective perception, decision making and actuation) for connected, cooperative and automated driving applications (using a balanced mix of edge-based solutions, cloud-enabled solutions and vehicle-central solutions), balancing speed and latency, energy use, costs, data sharing and storage needs and availability;
- Validated approaches incorporating edge-AI solutions into the action chain from perception and decision-making up to actuation of advanced CCAM functionalities - both on-board and on the infrastructure side - for systemic applications such as traffic management and remote control, as well as tools and approaches for training of such functionalities, which require optimised and verified edge-AI models.
Scope:
CCAM-enabled vehicles are constantly sensing their surroundings on road conditions, location, nearby vehicles and infrastructure. Such data is shared in real-time, while data from other sources is received. This needs powerful and optimised large data processing algorithms, which requires large amounts of computing power, data processing, real-time operation and high levels of security. However, most existing AI computing tasks for automated vehicle applications are relying on general-purpose hardware, which has limitations in terms of power consumption, speed, accuracy, scalability, memory footprint, size and cost. Hardware advancements driven by initiatives such as the Chips JU calls must be complemented by significant efforts to optimise AI algorithms for CCAM functionalities, ensuring their efficient performance on edge-specific hardware.
To encompass CCAM solutions in future steps towards e.g., the Software Defined Vehicle, this dual approach on AI advancements and hardware advancements is essential. Complementarities with projects funded under Cluster 4 “Digital Industry and Space” of Horizon Europe should also be considered where appropriate, especially in translating sector-agnostic innovations to the specificities of CCAM applications. Requirements on AI algorithm optimisation, latency, on-board energy availability, solutions to gain unbiased datasets for AI training, Electronic Control Unit (ECU) capacity and on potential safety-critical scenarios should be considered to ensure the timely triggering of actions, and in a later stage, anticipatory driving. Solutions should use, as far as possible, building blocks, interfaces, and tools from projects of the Software-Defined Vehicle of the Future (SDVoF) initiative.
Edge-AI involves deploying AI algorithms on edge computing devices, which are hardware systems constrained in proximity to the data source where they operate. This is done without relying on remote resources for the computational efforts. It thus facilitates real-time insights, responses and triggering of actions, with reduced costs as the processing power close to the application is used, greatly reducing networking costs. Combining AI with edge-AI can facilitate stable solutions to include the full activity chain from sensing, perception, decision-making up to actuation of advanced CCAM solutions, gaining speed and resilience which are essential in safety-critical situations.
To successfully overcome these challenges, proposed actions are expected to address all of the following aspects:
- For next major advancements in AI applications in CCAM solutions, huge AI applications need to fit into limited hardware, to make it fit for purpose. Edge-AI devices often have limited computational resources, making it challenging to deploy large and complex AI models. Thus, it is essential to develop and reshape approaches and building blocks for CCAM solutions, viable to be run on edge-hardware. Use cases for the approaches and building blocks should focus on time-critical applications (such as the chain from (collective) perception, decision making and actuation of functionalities) and can be linked to the activities and results from projects AI4CCAM[1] and AIthena[2].
- Develop optimised edge-AI algorithms and demonstrate their applicability and scalability, using real-world CCAM scenarios such as in the databases resulting from projects such as SYNERGIES[3]. The development and demonstration use case should include in-vehicle perception and understanding, such as object detection, segmentation, road surface tracking, sign and signal recognition, etc. Decision making and actuation of countermeasures is to be part of the chain of actions. The approaches for these building blocks and enabling technologies should facilitate a quick uptake in adjacent or following projects;
- Optimisation of the models for edge deployment. This involves adjusting the size and complexity of models to allow it to run on the relevant edge devices and include training and verification approaches. Techniques such as model quantization, pruning, and knowledge distillation can be used to reduce the size of AI models without significant loss in performance. Additionally, over-the-air (OTA) updates can be used to manage and update models across a fleet of devices efficiently;
- Develop tools and approaches for edge-AI model monitoring, to ensure that edge-AI systems continue to operate as expected and ensure resilience to failure conditions or attacks, and monitoring model outputs to ensure they are accurate even as real-life conditions and datasets change.
The research will require due consideration of cyber security, connectivity and both personal and non-personal data protection rules, including compliance with the GDPR, and ensure that gender and other social categories (such as but not limited to disability, age, socioeconomic status, ethnic or racial origin, sexual orientation, etc.), and their intersections are duly considered where appropriate, as well as Explainable AI to enhance trust and regulatory compliance including alignment with the AI Act.
In order to achieve the expected outcomes, international cooperation is encouraged in particular with Japan and the United States but also with other relevant strategic partners in third countries. Such cooperation should exploit synergies in edge AI approaches for mobility and for CCAM, as well as its integration into the vehicle architecture.
This topic implements the co-programmed European Partnership on ‘Connected, Cooperative and Automated Mobility’ (CCAM). As such, projects resulting from this topic will be expected to report on results to the European Partnership ‘Connected, Cooperative and Automated Mobility’ (CCAM) in support of the monitoring of its KPIs.
Projects resulting from this topic are expected to apply the European Common Evaluation Methodology (EU-CEM) for CCAM[4].
Projects funded under this topic are encouraged to explore potential complementarities with the activities of the European Commission's Joint Research Centre’s Sustainable, Smart, and Safe Mobility Unit and, where appropriate, establish formal collaboration.
null
Activities are expected to achieve TRL 5 by the end of the project – see General Annex B. Activities may start at any TRL.
[1] Trustworthy AI for CCAM, grant agreement ID: 101076911.
[2] AI-based CCAM: Trustworthy, Explainable, and Accountable, grant agreement ID: 101076754.
[3] Real and synthetic scenarios generated for the development, training, virtual testing and validation of CCAM systems, grant agreement ID: 101146542.
[4] See the evaluation methodology here.
News flashes
EVALUATION results
Published: 6 May 2025
Deadline: 20 January 2026
The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:
D2-01
D2-04
D2-05
D2-09
D5-17
D6-03
D6-04
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
30
29
24
18
16
28
4
Number of inadmissible proposals
0
0
0
2
1
3
0
Number of ineligible proposals
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
Number of above-threshold proposals
20
26
18
12
6
19
3
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR)
157,195,820.96
248,601,723.75
132,166,046.82
17,988,579.24
47,945,477.95
75,990,887.37
14,965,660.09
Number of proposals retained for funding
3
3
2
1
2
2
1
Number of proposals in the reserve list
3
3
2
2
2
3
2
Funding threshold (1)
13.50
15.00
13.50
15.00
12.50
14.50
14.50
Ranking distribution
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
2
5
1
4
0
2
1
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
2
6
3
3
1
5
0
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
16
15
14
5
5
12
2
D6-05
D6-06
D6-07
D6-08
D6-09
D6-10
D6-13
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
12
4
25
19
4
10
48
Number of inadmissible proposals
0
0
1
5
0
0
1
Number of ineligible proposals
0
0
3
1
1
0
0
Number of above-threshold proposals
9
3
18
6
3
9
32
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR)
36,134,090.35
11,848,306.66
185,736,461.70
46,503,126.51
10,115,009.66
70,959,683.30
158,537,805.84
Number of proposals retained for funding
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
Number of proposals in the reserve list
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
Funding threshold (1)
14.00
14.50
14.00
13.50
13.50
14.50
14.50
Ranking distribution
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
1
1
2
1
0
2
4
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
5
2
3
1
2
2
4
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
3
0
13
4
1
5
24
D6-14
D6-15
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
59
8
Number of inadmissible proposals
3
1
Number of ineligible proposals
0
0
Number of above-threshold proposals
46
4
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR)
228,771,694.64
15,994,205.72
Number of proposals retained for funding
2
1
Number of proposals in the reserve list
2
2
Funding threshold (1)
13.50
15.00
Ranking distribution
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
1
2
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
7
0
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
38
2
(1) Proposals with the same score were ranked according to the priority order procedure set out in the call conditions (for HE, in the General Annexes to the Work Programme or specific arrangements in the specific call/topic conditions). To determine the ranking for ‘Innovation actions’, the score for ‘Impact’ is given a weight of 1.5.
Summary of observer report:
“The evaluation was a long and complex task, with a large number of topics. The evaluators were drawn from a diverse range of backgrounds and were experts in their field. All experts were fully committed to the process and produced good quality individual reports, supported by very able project officers and moderators. The rapporteurs fully supported moderators and project officers in ensuring that the consensus meetings were conducted appropriately, and in a fair manner. In conclusion, this was a fair, equitable and well-conducted evaluation, which complied with the rules of the call.”
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
The call for proposals HORIZON-CL5-2026-01 has closed on 20 January 2026.
338 proposals have been submitted. The breakdown per topic is:
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-01 (IA): 30
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-04 (RIA): 29
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-05 (IA): 24
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-09 (CSA): 18
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D5-17 (IA): 16
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-03 (RIA): 28
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-04 (RIA): 4
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-05 (RIA): 12
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-06 (IA): 4
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-07 (IA): 25
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-08 (IA): 19
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-09 (CSA): 4
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-10 (IA): 10
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-13 (RIA): 48
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-14 (RIA): 59
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-15 (RIA): 8
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in May/June 2026.
As call HORIZON-CL5-2026-01 is from Horizon Europe Work Programme 2025, the relevant General Annexes apply:
Applicants are advised to use the dedicated versions of the application form template found in the application/submission form of their proposal.
Opening date: 2025-09-25 (1 year ago)
Closing date: 2026-01-20 (9 months ago)
Procedure: single-stage
Budget: 4,000,000
Expected grants: 1
Contribution: 4,000,000 - 4,000,000
This call topic has been appended 3 times by the EC with news.
-
2026-10-24
evaluation resultspublished: 6 may 2025d... -
2026-10-24
the call for proposals horizon-cl5-2026-... -
2026-10-24
as call horizon-cl5-2026-01 is from hori...
HORIZON-CL5-2026-01
Call topics are often grouped together in a call. Sometimes this is for a thematic reason, but often it is also for practical reasons.
There are 15 other topics in this call:
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-01
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-04
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-05
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-09
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D5-17
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-03
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-04
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-06
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-07
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-08
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-09
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-10
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-13
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-14
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-15
Showing the latest information. Found 9 versions of this call topic in the F&T portal.
Information from
- 2026-05-13_06-37-29
- 2026-02-10_06-33-01
- 2026-01-21_06-32-19
- 2026-01-16_06-32-17
- 2026-01-14_06-32-03
- 2025-10-28_15-45-42
- 2025-07-24_06-30-06
- 2025-07-18_03-30-14
- 2025-06-07_03-30-10
Check the differences between the versions.
Annotations
Events
Hand-picked events relevant to this call topic.
No events yet
There are currently no events linked to this call topic.
Timeline
Grant agreement signed · 20 Sep 2026 (1 month ago)
All expected milestones for this call have passed.
Call published
07 Jun 2025
Work programme published
25 Jul 2025 · est.
Call opens
25 Sep 2025
Call closes
20 Jan 2026
Outcome expected
20 Jun 2026 · est.
Grant agreement signed
20 Sep 2026 · est.
-
Call published
07 Jun 2025 · 1 year ago
This topic was first published in TopicTree.
-
Work programme published Estimated
25 Jul 2025 · 1 year ago
Topics are listed in the Work Programme before the call opens. Spotting this early gives you a head start on partner search and proposal planning.
-
Call opens
25 Sep 2025 · 1 year ago
Submissions can be made from this date.
-
Call closes
20 Jan 2026 · 9 months ago
Deadline to submit a proposal.
-
Outcome expected Estimated
20 Jun 2026 · 4 months ago
The maximum time to inform applicants of the evaluation outcome is five months after the call closes.
-
Grant agreement signed Estimated
20 Sep 2026 · 1 month ago
The maximum time to sign the grant agreement is three months after applicants are informed of the outcome.
Funded Projects
Loading...
Project information comes from CORDIS (for Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe) and will be sourced from F&T Portal (for Digital Europe projects)
Ecosystem bubbles
This call topic is part of the following thematic bubbles.
Not part of a bubble yet
This call topic has not been grouped into an ecosystem bubble.