Closed HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-04 HORIZON

Integration of human driving behaviour in the validation of CCAM systems (CCAM Partnership)

Call text (as on F&T portal)

View on F&T portal

Expected Outcome:

Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:

  • Validated human behavioural models representing the variety of human driving behaviour in safety-relevant scenarios, shared through a common repository and to be used:
    • to define pass criteria/ assessment criteria for CCAM systems in type approval schemes, consumer testing campaigns and industrial development processes;
    • to design safe, human-like behaviour of CCAM systems that can be anticipated easily by all road users and is acceptable to both CCAM vehicle occupants and all road users.
  • Application of such human behavioural models in the virtual safety validation of CCAM systems to realistically represent the behaviour of human-driven vehicles in closed loop simulations of mixed traffic, thereby reflecting the variety of human driving behaviour, including behaviour in complex real-world and emergency conditions.

Scope:

The deployment of CCAM systems in mixed traffic will mean intense interaction with all road users such as the human drivers of other vehicles as well as pedestrians and riders of two-wheelers. These interactions (including implicit and explicit communication by humans and CCAM systems) will play a crucial role in the acceptance and thereby the penetration of CCAM systems in future road transport. CCAM systems will have to show safe and human-like driving behaviour, so that their decisions and actions can be anticipated easily by all road users, respecting the variety of typical driving behaviour across different countries as well as the need for CCAM systems to respect traffic rules and support road safety.

This will require validated models of explicit and implicit human driving behaviour to design and validate such system behaviour. These models will be needed in closed loop simulations of CCAM systems in mixed traffic to realistically represent the reactions of human drivers in other vehicles to the behaviour of a CCAM system. Models representing human driving behaviour are being developed by the projects i4Driving[1] and BERTHA[2] for selected fields of application, i.e. they will be calibrated for a limited number of scenarios. Bringing together and building upon the results of these projects – in particular a simulation library and an innovative methodology to account for uncertainty from i4Driving and a scalable, probabilistic driver behavioural model from BERTHA, research is needed to extend the fields of application that these projects are addressing with a focus on representing driver behaviour in a multitude of safety-critical scenarios, considering the variation and statistical distribution of human behavioural patterns and the factors influencing such behaviour, including the parallel execution of non-driving related tasks.

To achieve high degrees of robustness and applicability in a wide range of scenarios, detailed calibration and parameterisation is necessary, as driver behaviour depends on factors such as the road infrastructure, vehicle types, traffic conditions and rules, as well as regional influences and driver experiences / demographics, e.g., gender, age and other relevant social variables. Considering the deviation of average from ideal human driving behaviour, proposed actions must also validate the models for their extended fields of application, going well beyond the applications and degrees of validation accomplished by the above-mentioned projects under HORIZON-CL5-2022-D6-01-03. Proposed actions are thus expected to raise the technology readiness of such models to TRL 5. Data for parameterisation and validation should be captured by monitoring real human drivers in driving simulators and/or real traffic considering what is happening inside and outside the vehicle.

Proposed actions should integrate, to the extent possible, the validated models in the virtual validation and verification approaches as developed in the projects HEADSTART[3] and SUNRISE[4] and complemented by the project SYNERGIES[5]. Successful integration should be demonstrated in various safety-relevant scenarios as provided by the action(s) funded under HORIZON-CL5-2023-D6-01-02[6]. Models should be shared via the federated data exchange platform for CCAM to be developed by an action under HORIZON-CL5-2025-D6-06[7].

Proposals are encouraged to also explore additional fields of application of validated driver behaviour models, while the integration of relevant expertise from social sciences and humanities (SSH) is expected.

To achieve the expected outcomes, international cooperation is encouraged with research stakeholders in Japan and the United States but also with other relevant strategic partners in third countries. Such cooperation should exploit synergies as far as possible in capturing data for the parametrisation and validation of behavioural models, while considering regional and cultural differences as well as specificities of respective road infrastructures.

This topic implements the co-programmed European Partnership on ‘Connected, Cooperative and Automated Mobility’ (CCAM). As such, projects resulting from this topic will be expected to report on results to the European Partnership ‘Connected, Cooperative and Automated Mobility’ (CCAM) in support of the monitoring of its KPIs.

Projects resulting from this topic are expected to apply the European Common Evaluation Methodology (EU-CEM) for CCAM[8].

Projects funded under this topic are encouraged to explore potential complementarities with the activities of the European Commission's Joint Research Centre’s Sustainable, Smart, and Safe Mobility Unit and, where appropriate, establish formal collaboration.

null

Activities are expected to achieve TRL 5 by the end of the project – see General Annex B. Activities may start at any TRL.

[1] Integrated 4D driver modelling under uncertainty, grant agreement ID: 101076165.

[2] BEhavioural ReplicaTion of Human drivers for CCAM, grant agreement ID: 101076360.

[3] Harmonised European solutions for testing automated road transport, grant agreement id: 824309.

[4] Safety assUraNce fRamework for connected, automated mobIlity SystEms, grant agreement ID: 101069573.

[5] Real and synthetic scenarios generated for the development, training, virtual testing and validation of CCAM systems, grant agreement ID: 101146542.

[6] Generation of scenarios for development, training, virtual testing and validation of CCAM systems

[7] Federated CCAM data exchange platform (see below).

[8] See the evaluation methodology here.

News flashes

2026-10-24

EVALUATION results

Published: 6 May 2025

Deadline: 20 January 2026

The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:

D2-01

D2-04

D2-05

D2-09

D5-17

D6-03

D6-04

Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)

30

29

24

18

16

28

4

Number of inadmissible proposals

0

0

0

2

1

3

0

Number of ineligible proposals

1

0

1

0

1

0

0

Number of above-threshold proposals

20

26

18

12

6

19

3

Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR)

157,195,820.96

248,601,723.75

132,166,046.82

17,988,579.24

47,945,477.95

75,990,887.37

14,965,660.09

Number of proposals retained for funding

3

3

2

1

2

2

1

Number of proposals in the reserve list

3

3

2

2

2

3

2

Funding threshold (1)

13.50

15.00

13.50

15.00

12.50

14.50

14.50

Ranking distribution

Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14

2

5

1

4

0

2

1

Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13

2

6

3

3

1

5

0

Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10

16

15

14

5

5

12

2

D6-05

D6-06

D6-07

D6-08

D6-09

D6-10

D6-13

Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)

12

4

25

19

4

10

48

Number of inadmissible proposals

0

0

1

5

0

0

1

Number of ineligible proposals

0

0

3

1

1

0

0

Number of above-threshold proposals

9

3

18

6

3

9

32

Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR)

36,134,090.35

11,848,306.66

185,736,461.70

46,503,126.51

10,115,009.66

70,959,683.30

158,537,805.84

Number of proposals retained for funding

1

1

2

2

1

2

2

Number of proposals in the reserve list

3

2

2

2

2

2

2

Funding threshold (1)

14.00

14.50

14.00

13.50

13.50

14.50

14.50

Ranking distribution

Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14

1

1

2

1

0

2

4

Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13

5

2

3

1

2

2

4

Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10

3

0

13

4

1

5

24

D6-14

D6-15

Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)

59

8

Number of inadmissible proposals

3

1

Number of ineligible proposals

0

0

Number of above-threshold proposals

46

4

Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR)

228,771,694.64

15,994,205.72

Number of proposals retained for funding

2

1

Number of proposals in the reserve list

2

2

Funding threshold (1)

13.50

15.00

Ranking distribution

Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14

1

2

Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13

7

0

Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10

38

2

(1) Proposals with the same score were ranked according to the priority order procedure set out in the call conditions (for HE, in the General Annexes to the Work Programme or specific arrangements in the specific call/topic conditions). To determine the ranking for ‘Innovation actions’, the score for ‘Impact’ is given a weight of 1.5.

Summary of observer report:

“The evaluation was a long and complex task, with a large number of topics. The evaluators were drawn from a diverse range of backgrounds and were experts in their field. All experts were fully committed to the process and produced good quality individual reports, supported by very able project officers and moderators. The rapporteurs fully supported moderators and project officers in ensuring that the consensus meetings were conducted appropriately, and in a fair manner. In conclusion, this was a fair, equitable and well-conducted evaluation, which complied with the rules of the call.”

We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.

For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.

2026-10-24

The call for proposals HORIZON-CL5-2026-01 has closed on 20 January 2026.

338 proposals have been submitted. The breakdown per topic is:

  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-01 (IA): 30
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-04 (RIA): 29
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-05 (IA): 24
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-09 (CSA): 18
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D5-17 (IA): 16
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-03 (RIA): 28
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-04 (RIA): 4
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-05 (RIA): 12
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-06 (IA): 4
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-07 (IA): 25
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-08 (IA): 19
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-09 (CSA): 4
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-10 (IA): 10
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-13 (RIA): 48
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-14 (RIA): 59
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-15 (RIA): 8

Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in May/June 2026.

2026-10-24

As call HORIZON-CL5-2026-01 is from Horizon Europe Work Programme 2025, the relevant General Annexes apply:

https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/wp-call/2025/wp-14-general-annexes_horizon-2025_en.pdf

Applicants are advised to use the dedicated versions of the application form template found in the application/submission form of their proposal.

call topic details
Call status: Closed
Opening date: 2025-09-25 (1 year ago)
Closing date: 2026-01-20 (9 months ago)
Procedure: single-stage

Budget: 5,000,000
Expected grants: 1
Contribution: 5,000,000 - 5,000,000
News flashes

This call topic has been appended 3 times by the EC with news.

  • 2026-10-24
    evaluation resultspublished: 6 may 2025d...
  • 2026-10-24
    the call for proposals horizon-cl5-2026-...
  • 2026-10-24
    as call horizon-cl5-2026-01 is from hori...
Source information

Showing the latest information. Found 9 versions of this call topic in the F&T portal.

Information from

  • 2026-05-13_06-37-26
  • 2026-02-10_06-33-04
  • 2026-01-21_06-32-16
  • 2026-01-16_06-32-18
  • 2026-01-14_06-32-00
  • 2025-10-28_15-45-41
  • 2025-07-24_06-30-07
  • 2025-07-18_03-30-14
  • 2025-06-07_03-30-10

Check the differences between the versions.

Annotations

You must be logged in to add annotations
No annotations yet

Events

Hand-picked events relevant to this call topic.

No events yet

There are currently no events linked to this call topic.

Timeline

Track where this call stands in its lifecycle, from work programme to grant signature, and see what's likely to happen next.

Grant agreement signed · 20 Sep 2026 (1 month ago)

All expected milestones for this call have passed.

Today

Call published

07 Jun 2025

Work programme published

25 Jul 2025 · est.

Call opens

25 Sep 2025

Call closes

20 Jan 2026

Outcome expected

20 Jun 2026 · est.

Grant agreement signed

20 Sep 2026 · est.

Preparation Open for submission Evaluation Grant preparation Not yet reached
  1. Call published

    07 Jun 2025 · 1 year ago

    This topic was first published in TopicTree.

  2. Work programme published Estimated

    25 Jul 2025 · 1 year ago

    Topics are listed in the Work Programme before the call opens. Spotting this early gives you a head start on partner search and proposal planning.

  3. Call opens

    25 Sep 2025 · 1 year ago

    Submissions can be made from this date.

  4. Call closes

    20 Jan 2026 · 9 months ago

    Deadline to submit a proposal.

  5. Outcome expected Estimated

    20 Jun 2026 · 4 months ago

    The maximum time to inform applicants of the evaluation outcome is five months after the call closes.

  6. Grant agreement signed Estimated

    20 Sep 2026 · 1 month ago

    The maximum time to sign the grant agreement is three months after applicants are informed of the outcome.

Funded Projects

Loading...

Project information comes from CORDIS (for Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe) and will be sourced from F&T Portal (for Digital Europe projects)

Ecosystem bubbles

This call topic is part of the following thematic bubbles.

Not part of a bubble yet

This call topic has not been grouped into an ecosystem bubble.

Call document info

This section will come soon and contain the scraped information from the call document, such as the expected impact, scope, and other relevant sections. In the meantime, you can find this information in the call text section or directly on the F&T portal. View on F&T portal