Closed HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-03 HORIZON

Next-generation environment perception for real world CCAM operations: Error-free and secure technologies to improve energy-efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and circularity (CCAM Partnership)

Call text (as on F&T portal)

View on F&T portal

Expected Outcome:

Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following outcomes:

  • Availability of validated prototypes of next-generation vehicle and infrastructure-based environment perception technologies for robust, reliable and trustworthy CCAM operations to anticipate and avoid foreseeable risks and unexpected safety-critical situations in complex real-world conditions (e.g., at pedestrian crossings, in construction sites, during interactions with emergency vehicles, etc.);
  • Understanding the degree (and limits) to which automated CCAM perception systems can anticipate, process, and respond to on-site ‘early-warnings’ (e.g., street design, sounds, smells and other signals from the environment, weather conditions, intentions of pedestrians, cyclists, and other active mobility users, etc.);
  • Improvement of the energy-efficiency of the sense-think-act systems of CCAM considering the vehicle, the infrastructure, the cloud at-the-edge, while at the same time increasing the performance to guarantee security and error-free reliability; these developments will contribute to the reduction of the potential climate and environmental footprints of CCAM systems;
  • Standardisation and adoption of modular, reusable, and upgradable software and hardware platforms, investigating scalable deployment concepts that lead to cost reduction and improved affordability while adopting a circular, eco-design approach (including efficient materials use, reduced waste, and the repair and reuse of components where feasible).

Scope:

The initial deployment of Level 4 automated vehicle services in urban and other complex settings has encountered significant challenges in environmental perception and decision-making, leading to occasional remote assistance calls, blockages and accidents that have impacted public trust. At the same time, the increasing computing power demand is in conflict with a limited usage of energy and resources to meet sustainability requirements. Thus, emerging large-scale demonstrations of automated vehicles should be accompanied by objective-oriented research aimed at addressing these challenges directly, while targeting improvements in performance, accuracy, reliability, and cyber-security.

To successfully overcome these challenges, proposed actions for this topic are expected to address all of the following aspects:

  • Advancements in all steps of the sense-control-act process for both vehicle- and infrastructure-based smart sensor systems and networks, controllers, and actuators to ensure safety and trustworthiness of CCAM, as well as facilitating effective disruption management;
  • Utilisation of digital enabling technologies including, for example: AI at-the-edge, machine learning, data spaces with reference scenarios and suitable software architectures[1];
  • Adoption of modular, reusable, and open software platforms supporting the environment perception for CCAM while ensuring transparency of operation, verification, and safety assessment to build trust, with respect to authorities, decision makers and the public via direct performance explainability;
  • Energy efficiency, circularity, and eco-design of the environment perception systems by decreasing potential energy and resource consumption in both production and operation as well as facilitating reusability, reparability and upgradability while further enhancing the performance;
  • Reduction of potential costs of environment perception systems through scalability, modularity and standardisation, making technologies financially viable for widespread implementation;
  • Support remote assistance as a stepping-stone towards higher levels of autonomy and vehicle automation in wider Operational Design Domains (ODD).

Solutions are expected to integrate electronic hardware architectures and software stacks in a co-design approach. Hence, it is strongly encouraged that solutions use, as far as possible, building blocks and tools from projects of the Software-Defined Vehicle of the Future (SDVoF) initiative under the Chips Joint Undertaking, e.g., on the hardware abstraction layer and SDV middleware and API framework. Results from projects funded under HORIZON-CL5-2024-D6-01-04[2] and complementarities with projects funded under Horizon Europe Cluster 4 “Digital Industry and Space” should also be considered, where appropriate.

As the activities should demonstrate feasibility and their full potential for real-world applications, proposals should foresee exchanges with other relevant EU or national projects for e.g., coordinated validation, transport systems integration and large-scale piloting. Collaboration should also be sought with projects funded under HORIZON-CL5-2024-D6-01-01[3] and other directly relevant call topics.

In view of the relevance of environment perception and decision-making of automated vehicles for the responsiveness of the innovation to diverse societal interests and concerns, accessibility, inclusiveness as well as regulation, proposals should consider societal, ethical, socio-economical and/ or legal aspects as far as feasible in the requirements of the technical solutions to be developed. This could involve the engagement of institutional users as well as citizen-science approaches, e.g., in collaboration with projects CulturalRoad[4] and Diversify – CCAM[5].

To achieve the expected outcomes, international cooperation is highly relevant, considering the lessons learned in this area (for example, from robo-taxi and freight transport trials in the US and China). Activities should foster links between the European ecosystem and relevant stakeholders around the world, in particular with Japan and the United States but also with other relevant strategic partners in third countries, while taking into account the legal, cultural, historical, and social aspects in Europe as well as other specificities of the European road network and cities (including: traffic rules, user behaviour, diverse user groups considering gender, age, disability, socio-economic status, streets morphology, and the structure and condition of roads in rural areas).

This topic implements the co-programmed European Partnership on ‘Connected, Cooperative and Automated Mobility’ (CCAM). As such, projects resulting from this topic will be expected to report on results to the European Partnership ‘Connected, Cooperative and Automated Mobility’ (CCAM) in support of the monitoring of its KPIs.

Projects resulting from this topic are expected to apply the European Common Evaluation Methodology (EU-CEM) for CCAM[6].

null

Activities are expected to achieve TRL 5 by the end of the project – see General Annex B. Activities may start at any TRL.

[1] In line with the European Artificial Intelligence strategy and requirements for trustworthy, explainable, and safe AI.

[2] AI for advanced and collective perception and decision making for CCAM applications

[3] Centralised, reliable, cyber-secure & upgradable in-vehicle electronic control architectures for CCAM connected to the cloud-edge continuum.

[4] Cocreate, Embrace – grant agreement ID: 101147397.

[5] Diversify CCAM by integrating European cultural and regional variations in the design and implementation of citizen-friendly systems to foster mobility equity - grant agreement id: 101147484.

[6] See the evaluation methodology here.

News flashes

2026-10-24

EVALUATION results

Published: 6 May 2025

Deadline: 20 January 2026

The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:

D2-01

D2-04

D2-05

D2-09

D5-17

D6-03

D6-04

Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)

30

29

24

18

16

28

4

Number of inadmissible proposals

0

0

0

2

1

3

0

Number of ineligible proposals

1

0

1

0

1

0

0

Number of above-threshold proposals

20

26

18

12

6

19

3

Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR)

157,195,820.96

248,601,723.75

132,166,046.82

17,988,579.24

47,945,477.95

75,990,887.37

14,965,660.09

Number of proposals retained for funding

3

3

2

1

2

2

1

Number of proposals in the reserve list

3

3

2

2

2

3

2

Funding threshold (1)

13.50

15.00

13.50

15.00

12.50

14.50

14.50

Ranking distribution

Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14

2

5

1

4

0

2

1

Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13

2

6

3

3

1

5

0

Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10

16

15

14

5

5

12

2

D6-05

D6-06

D6-07

D6-08

D6-09

D6-10

D6-13

Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)

12

4

25

19

4

10

48

Number of inadmissible proposals

0

0

1

5

0

0

1

Number of ineligible proposals

0

0

3

1

1

0

0

Number of above-threshold proposals

9

3

18

6

3

9

32

Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR)

36,134,090.35

11,848,306.66

185,736,461.70

46,503,126.51

10,115,009.66

70,959,683.30

158,537,805.84

Number of proposals retained for funding

1

1

2

2

1

2

2

Number of proposals in the reserve list

3

2

2

2

2

2

2

Funding threshold (1)

14.00

14.50

14.00

13.50

13.50

14.50

14.50

Ranking distribution

Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14

1

1

2

1

0

2

4

Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13

5

2

3

1

2

2

4

Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10

3

0

13

4

1

5

24

D6-14

D6-15

Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)

59

8

Number of inadmissible proposals

3

1

Number of ineligible proposals

0

0

Number of above-threshold proposals

46

4

Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR)

228,771,694.64

15,994,205.72

Number of proposals retained for funding

2

1

Number of proposals in the reserve list

2

2

Funding threshold (1)

13.50

15.00

Ranking distribution

Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14

1

2

Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13

7

0

Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10

38

2

(1) Proposals with the same score were ranked according to the priority order procedure set out in the call conditions (for HE, in the General Annexes to the Work Programme or specific arrangements in the specific call/topic conditions). To determine the ranking for ‘Innovation actions’, the score for ‘Impact’ is given a weight of 1.5.

Summary of observer report:

“The evaluation was a long and complex task, with a large number of topics. The evaluators were drawn from a diverse range of backgrounds and were experts in their field. All experts were fully committed to the process and produced good quality individual reports, supported by very able project officers and moderators. The rapporteurs fully supported moderators and project officers in ensuring that the consensus meetings were conducted appropriately, and in a fair manner. In conclusion, this was a fair, equitable and well-conducted evaluation, which complied with the rules of the call.”

We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.

For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.

2026-10-24

The call for proposals HORIZON-CL5-2026-01 has closed on 20 January 2026.

338 proposals have been submitted. The breakdown per topic is:

  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-01 (IA): 30
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-04 (RIA): 29
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-05 (IA): 24
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-09 (CSA): 18
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D5-17 (IA): 16
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-03 (RIA): 28
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-04 (RIA): 4
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-05 (RIA): 12
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-06 (IA): 4
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-07 (IA): 25
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-08 (IA): 19
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-09 (CSA): 4
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-10 (IA): 10
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-13 (RIA): 48
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-14 (RIA): 59
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-15 (RIA): 8

Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in May/June 2026.

2026-10-24

As call HORIZON-CL5-2026-01 is from Horizon Europe Work Programme 2025, the relevant General Annexes apply:

https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/wp-call/2025/wp-14-general-annexes_horizon-2025_en.pdf

Applicants are advised to use the dedicated versions of the application form template found in the application/submission form of their proposal.

call topic details
Call status: Closed
Opening date: 2025-09-25 (1 year ago)
Closing date: 2026-01-20 (9 months ago)
Procedure: single-stage

Budget: 8,000,000
Expected grants: 2
Contribution: 4,000,000 - 4,000,000
News flashes

This call topic has been appended 3 times by the EC with news.

  • 2026-10-24
    evaluation resultspublished: 6 may 2025d...
  • 2026-10-24
    the call for proposals horizon-cl5-2026-...
  • 2026-10-24
    as call horizon-cl5-2026-01 is from hori...
Source information

Showing the latest information. Found 9 versions of this call topic in the F&T portal.

Information from

  • 2026-05-13_06-37-26
  • 2026-02-10_06-32-55
  • 2026-01-21_06-32-21
  • 2026-01-16_06-32-20
  • 2026-01-14_06-32-01
  • 2025-10-28_15-45-42
  • 2025-07-24_06-30-06
  • 2025-07-18_03-30-14
  • 2025-06-07_03-30-10

Check the differences between the versions.

Annotations

You must be logged in to add annotations
No annotations yet

Events

Hand-picked events relevant to this call topic.

No events yet

There are currently no events linked to this call topic.

Timeline

Track where this call stands in its lifecycle, from work programme to grant signature, and see what's likely to happen next.

Grant agreement signed · 20 Sep 2026 (1 month ago)

All expected milestones for this call have passed.

Today

Call published

07 Jun 2025

Work programme published

25 Jul 2025 · est.

Call opens

25 Sep 2025

Call closes

20 Jan 2026

Outcome expected

20 Jun 2026 · est.

Grant agreement signed

20 Sep 2026 · est.

Preparation Open for submission Evaluation Grant preparation Not yet reached
  1. Call published

    07 Jun 2025 · 1 year ago

    This topic was first published in TopicTree.

  2. Work programme published Estimated

    25 Jul 2025 · 1 year ago

    Topics are listed in the Work Programme before the call opens. Spotting this early gives you a head start on partner search and proposal planning.

  3. Call opens

    25 Sep 2025 · 1 year ago

    Submissions can be made from this date.

  4. Call closes

    20 Jan 2026 · 9 months ago

    Deadline to submit a proposal.

  5. Outcome expected Estimated

    20 Jun 2026 · 4 months ago

    The maximum time to inform applicants of the evaluation outcome is five months after the call closes.

  6. Grant agreement signed Estimated

    20 Sep 2026 · 1 month ago

    The maximum time to sign the grant agreement is three months after applicants are informed of the outcome.

Funded Projects

Loading...

Project information comes from CORDIS (for Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe) and will be sourced from F&T Portal (for Digital Europe projects)

Ecosystem bubbles

This call topic is part of the following thematic bubbles.

Not part of a bubble yet

This call topic has not been grouped into an ecosystem bubble.

Call document info

This section will come soon and contain the scraped information from the call document, such as the expected impact, scope, and other relevant sections. In the meantime, you can find this information in the call text section or directly on the F&T portal. View on F&T portal