Safety of Cyclists, Pedestrians and Users of Micromobility Devices
Call text (as on F&T portal)
View on F&T portalExpected Outcome:
Project results are expected to contribute to all the following expected outcomes:
- Improved (compared to the current figures for the locations selected for the pilot testing) road safety (actual and perceived) for pedestrians, cyclists, e-cyclists and users of other micro-mobility devices, considering that the safety of these users is not only at risk from motorised vehicles, but also from their interaction with road users with higher masses or operating speeds (e.g. between e-bikes and pedestrians);
- An in-depth analysis and assessment of the safety associated with the emergence of electrically assisted small vehicles such e-bikes, e-cargo bikes, e-scooters, to be referred to as micromobility modes, that may be shared or own, and are used for personal mobility (e.g. commuting) and the transportation of goods (e.g. parcel delivery);
- Increased (compared to the current figures for the locations selected for the pilot testing) use of active and micromobility modes in all age and socioeconomic groups as a result of improved safety;
- Standardisation guidelines for the authorities (cities authorities, police, and hospitals) on how to report crashes that involve micromobility modes with the objective to avoid under- and/or misreporting;
- Guidelines for the city authorities on how to incorporate micromobility modes in their Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs) and account for the safety and convenience of all road users;
- Development of mitigating solutions for the adverse impact on the safety of cyclists, pedestrians, and other users of the changing car fleet towards bigger and heavier vehicles;
- In depth analysis of the impact of road infrastructure (e.g. design, markings, degradation status, quality, network connectivity) on the safety and comfort of cyclists, pedestrians, and micromobility users and development of mitigation solutions;
- Assessment methodologies to evaluate the safety potential and the effectiveness of advanced safety measures.
Scope:
The share of trips made by active modes is increasing, which is in line with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. This increase is linked to cities actively placing more focus on the mobility and safety needs of pedestrians, cyclists, e-cyclists and users of other micro-mobility device, which materialises in new regulations, and in new or improved infrastructure. However, pedestrians and cyclists remain heavily affected by crashes. Concurrently, the use of electrically assisted devices (such as e-bikes, e-scooters, e-cargo bikes, mobility systems used by people with disabilities, etc.) – to be referred to as micromobility modes – is increasing exponentially because these modes represent an efficient means of personal mobility, as well as a new and effective mode for the last-mile delivery of goods within the city area. Micromobility modes, shared and owned, have been adopted by commuters, tourists, the elderly, food and goods delivery companies, and come in varying sizes and operating speeds. When their use emerged, micromobility modes were associated with high hospitalisation rates, mainly for the micromobility users themselves, but also pedestrians and cyclists. While efforts have been made to regularise and standardise these vehicles, especially in the case of shared e-scooters, there is still a significant knowledge gap related to the operational safety of these vehicles in cities.
Proposals submitted under this topic should address all of the following aspects:
- Collect and use exposure data when analysing the safety of pedestrians, cyclists, and micromobility users, and identify crash contributing factors and their interactions;
- Provide an extensive analysis of the safety needs, as well as tailored safety measures for cyclists and each type of micromobility mode (e.g. shared e-scooters versus owned e-bikes), while taking into account the trip purpose (e.g. recreational ride versus delivery of goods), and the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of the users;
- Assess the actual and perceived safety risk of pedestrians and cyclists due to the emergence of micromobility modes that operate at higher speeds and that have increased in size and weight;
- Quantify the impact of the geometric design, quality, and continuity of the cycling infrastructure on the safety of cyclists, pedestrians and micromobility users, considering their increasing demand, operating speeds, and size of vehicles;
- Assess the potential effectiveness of vehicle-to-everything (V2X) technologies in decreasing conflicts and near misses between pedestrians, cyclists and micromobility vehicles, and users and motorised vehicles;
- Identify best practices in the design of bicycles and micromobility vehicles in terms of stability and the avoidance of single crashes, contributing to the underlying development of a draft European regulatory framework on the type-approval of micromobility vehicles or self-certification based on harmonised standards;
- Identify, define and pilot test the following in at least two clearly identified real-life urban environments:
- new geometric designs of infrastructure to ensure safe, seamless, and comfortable mobility for pedestrians, cyclists and users of micromobility modes while accounting for the increasing demand, higher operating speeds and weight and size of e-bikes, e-scooters and all types of micromobility devices;
- smart technologies (V2X) to assess their effectiveness in preventing and decreasing conflicts between pedestrians, cyclists, micromobility modes users and motorised traffic;
- road safety requisites, requirements, rules and/or regulations that could be put in place by local authorities in order to increase the take-up and the safety of active and micromobility modes in all age and socioeconomic groups, by 20% compared to the baseline at the start of the project;
- development of a comprehensive, real-time information platform for cyclists that includes data on route accessibility, signage, and infrastructure conditions.
Special focus should be paid to supporting the safety of user groups with particular vulnerability including people with disabilities (physical, mental, cognitive, developmental, intellectual, sensory, etc).
Proposals are invited to explain how the work supports local/regional/national authorities’ efforts to deliver on the objectives of the Vision Zero Strategy, the Strategic Action Plan on Road Safety and the EU Road Safety Policy Framework 2021-2030 as well as on the integration of road safety policies and programmes in Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning.
Proposals should plan for an active collaboration with the well-recognised initiatives in the field of road safety and urban mobility such as the European Road Safety Observatory and the CIVITAS initiative. In addition, proposals should demonstrate that the proposed approaches build upon the results from previous research actions[1] and liaise and collaborate with the projects that will be selected under topic “HORIZON-MISS-2025-06-CIT-CANCER-01: Walking and cycling: increasing their modal share to reap health benefits and emission reductions and integrating active mobility and micro-mobility devices, with smart technologies and infrastructure”.
This topic requires the effective contribution of social sciences and humanities (SSH) disciplines and the involvement of SSH experts and institutions, as well as the inclusion of relevant SSH expertise, to produce meaningful and significant effects enhancing the societal impact of the related research activities, with a focus on human-technology interaction, responsiveness of safety solutions and how this varies across different population groups, and behavioural norms.
null
Activities are expected to achieve TRL 5-6 by the end of the project – see General Annex B. Activities may start at any TRL.
[1] E.g. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/861570 and https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/723430 projects
News flashes
EVALUATION results
Published: 6 May 2025
Deadline: 20 January 2026
The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:
D2-01
D2-04
D2-05
D2-09
D5-17
D6-03
D6-04
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
30
29
24
18
16
28
4
Number of inadmissible proposals
0
0
0
2
1
3
0
Number of ineligible proposals
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
Number of above-threshold proposals
20
26
18
12
6
19
3
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR)
157,195,820.96
248,601,723.75
132,166,046.82
17,988,579.24
47,945,477.95
75,990,887.37
14,965,660.09
Number of proposals retained for funding
3
3
2
1
2
2
1
Number of proposals in the reserve list
3
3
2
2
2
3
2
Funding threshold (1)
13.50
15.00
13.50
15.00
12.50
14.50
14.50
Ranking distribution
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
2
5
1
4
0
2
1
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
2
6
3
3
1
5
0
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
16
15
14
5
5
12
2
D6-05
D6-06
D6-07
D6-08
D6-09
D6-10
D6-13
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
12
4
25
19
4
10
48
Number of inadmissible proposals
0
0
1
5
0
0
1
Number of ineligible proposals
0
0
3
1
1
0
0
Number of above-threshold proposals
9
3
18
6
3
9
32
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR)
36,134,090.35
11,848,306.66
185,736,461.70
46,503,126.51
10,115,009.66
70,959,683.30
158,537,805.84
Number of proposals retained for funding
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
Number of proposals in the reserve list
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
Funding threshold (1)
14.00
14.50
14.00
13.50
13.50
14.50
14.50
Ranking distribution
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
1
1
2
1
0
2
4
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
5
2
3
1
2
2
4
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
3
0
13
4
1
5
24
D6-14
D6-15
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)
59
8
Number of inadmissible proposals
3
1
Number of ineligible proposals
0
0
Number of above-threshold proposals
46
4
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR)
228,771,694.64
15,994,205.72
Number of proposals retained for funding
2
1
Number of proposals in the reserve list
2
2
Funding threshold (1)
13.50
15.00
Ranking distribution
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14
1
2
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13
7
0
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10
38
2
(1) Proposals with the same score were ranked according to the priority order procedure set out in the call conditions (for HE, in the General Annexes to the Work Programme or specific arrangements in the specific call/topic conditions). To determine the ranking for ‘Innovation actions’, the score for ‘Impact’ is given a weight of 1.5.
Summary of observer report:
“The evaluation was a long and complex task, with a large number of topics. The evaluators were drawn from a diverse range of backgrounds and were experts in their field. All experts were fully committed to the process and produced good quality individual reports, supported by very able project officers and moderators. The rapporteurs fully supported moderators and project officers in ensuring that the consensus meetings were conducted appropriately, and in a fair manner. In conclusion, this was a fair, equitable and well-conducted evaluation, which complied with the rules of the call.”
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
The call for proposals HORIZON-CL5-2026-01 has closed on 20 January 2026.
338 proposals have been submitted. The breakdown per topic is:
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-01 (IA): 30
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-04 (RIA): 29
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-05 (IA): 24
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-09 (CSA): 18
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D5-17 (IA): 16
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-03 (RIA): 28
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-04 (RIA): 4
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-05 (RIA): 12
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-06 (IA): 4
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-07 (IA): 25
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-08 (IA): 19
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-09 (CSA): 4
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-10 (IA): 10
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-13 (RIA): 48
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-14 (RIA): 59
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-15 (RIA): 8
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in May/June 2026.
As call HORIZON-CL5-2026-01 is from Horizon Europe Work Programme 2025, the relevant General Annexes apply:
Applicants are advised to use the dedicated versions of the application form template found in the application/submission form of their proposal.
Opening date: 2025-09-25 (1 year ago)
Closing date: 2026-01-20 (9 months ago)
Procedure: single-stage
Budget: 10,000,000
Expected grants: 2
Contribution: 5,000,000 - 5,000,000
This call topic has been appended 3 times by the EC with news.
-
2026-10-24
evaluation resultspublished: 6 may 2025d... -
2026-10-24
the call for proposals horizon-cl5-2026-... -
2026-10-24
as call horizon-cl5-2026-01 is from hori...
HORIZON-CL5-2026-01
Call topics are often grouped together in a call. Sometimes this is for a thematic reason, but often it is also for practical reasons.
There are 15 other topics in this call:
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-01
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-04
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-05
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-09
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D5-17
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-03
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-04
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-05
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-06
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-07
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-08
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-09
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-10
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-14
- HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-15
Showing the latest information. Found 9 versions of this call topic in the F&T portal.
Information from
- 2026-05-13_06-37-19
- 2026-02-10_06-33-01
- 2026-01-21_06-32-14
- 2026-01-16_06-32-19
- 2026-01-14_06-32-02
- 2025-10-28_15-45-42
- 2025-07-24_06-30-06
- 2025-07-18_03-30-13
- 2025-06-07_03-30-10
Check the differences between the versions.
Annotations
Events
Hand-picked events relevant to this call topic.
No events yet
There are currently no events linked to this call topic.
Timeline
Grant agreement signed · 20 Sep 2026 (1 month ago)
All expected milestones for this call have passed.
Call published
07 Jun 2025
Work programme published
25 Jul 2025 · est.
Call opens
25 Sep 2025
Call closes
20 Jan 2026
Outcome expected
20 Jun 2026 · est.
Grant agreement signed
20 Sep 2026 · est.
-
Call published
07 Jun 2025 · 1 year ago
This topic was first published in TopicTree.
-
Work programme published Estimated
25 Jul 2025 · 1 year ago
Topics are listed in the Work Programme before the call opens. Spotting this early gives you a head start on partner search and proposal planning.
-
Call opens
25 Sep 2025 · 1 year ago
Submissions can be made from this date.
-
Call closes
20 Jan 2026 · 9 months ago
Deadline to submit a proposal.
-
Outcome expected Estimated
20 Jun 2026 · 4 months ago
The maximum time to inform applicants of the evaluation outcome is five months after the call closes.
-
Grant agreement signed Estimated
20 Sep 2026 · 1 month ago
The maximum time to sign the grant agreement is three months after applicants are informed of the outcome.
Funded Projects
Loading...
Project information comes from CORDIS (for Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe) and will be sourced from F&T Portal (for Digital Europe projects)
Ecosystem bubbles
This call topic is part of the following thematic bubbles.
Not part of a bubble yet
This call topic has not been grouped into an ecosystem bubble.