Closed HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-06 HORIZON

Federated CCAM data exchange platform (CCAM Partnership)

Related topics

Hover a topic or connection to preview why it's linked, click for details, double-click to open it · drag to rearrange

Centre = current topic · inner ring = direct links, outer ring = topics linked through one of them · colour = call status (click a status to hide it) · thicker line = stronger link

Topics in this graph

1 direct link · 2 linked through them

  • HORIZON-BRIDGING-2027-01-10 Forthcoming User Input · weight 1
    Autonomous Drive Ambition Cities (IA) - Apply AI

    Projects funded under HORIZON-BRIDGING-2027-01-10 are expected to show complementarity with projects funded under HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-06.

    Linked through HORIZON-BRIDGING-2027-01-10 (2)

Call text (as on F&T portal)

View on F&T portal

Expected Outcome:

Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:

  • Overview of CCAM-specific limitations of current data exchange solutions and existing dataspaces related to interfaces, harmonised ontologies and taxonomies, standards, formats, monetisation / compensation;
  • Mapping of information and reference data needs for KPIs collected by Member States and Associated Countries (where relevant and to the extent possible), related to impacts of CCAM technologies and solutions;
  • Federated sustainable CCAM Data Exchange Platform that facilitates sharing of data for both large-scale demonstrations and deployment, interfacing existing data spaces and improving the exchange, availability, and accessibility of data for the development, testing and deployment of CCAM services (including but not limited to Digital Twins, digital scenario representations, safety assurance and validation, ADS regulation monitoring, driver behaviour, AI model training, and the collection of national/EU level statistics and Key Performance Indicators);
  • Proposed governance structure for the Data Exchange Platform with a sustainability plan and viable business model.

Scope:

Data sharing plays a pivotal role in supporting R&I, enabling deployment, and enhancing the competitiveness of the CCAM industry. Within the realm of data sharing, there are two distinct categories of data that are particularly pertinent: mobility data, and data for research and development. The common European mobility data space[1] aims to facilitate mobility data access and sharing, and is supported by projects, notably from the Digital Europe Programme. This mobility data space will facilitate the sharing of data related to mobility patterns, traffic flow, and other macroscopic aspects that are essential for the development of CCAM solutions. Within the research, testing and deployment of CCAM solutions for the automotive as well as infrastructure sectors, there is a need for a dedicated data space tailored specifically to the requirements of CCAM stakeholders. This CCAM Data Space demands a more granular and extensive array of data to cater to the needs of both Tier X suppliers, Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), traffic managers and infrastructure providers, particularly in terms of vehicle and traffic safety considerations. Specific aspects related to ongoing regulatory developments would need to be considered (e.g. Automated Driving Systems and General Safety regulations, adaption of type approval to the AI Act, including trustworthy AI integration).

Several data spaces exist or are being developed in Europe for CCAM in specific R&I initiatives. The FAME[2] project has released a CCAM Data Sharing Framework (DSF) 2.0 describing best practices in data sharing and will develop a CCAM Federated Data Space as a proof of concept to facilitate the exchange of research and test data across R&I projects. Several CCAM Partnership R&I projects expressed interest in making data available and reusing data from other projects through the FAME Test Data Space, once it will be operational. The scenario-based validation approach for safety argumentation in highly automated functions will result in an integration of various scenario databases facilitated by a federated layer, as developed in project SUNRISE[3] and SYNERGIES[4]. However, this integration falls short of constituting a comprehensive Data Space approach, both for new data sets and extensions of existing datasets. To achieve full Data Space functionality for CCAM, significant enhancements are required in terms of developing connectors, APIs, and protocols for seamless data exchange. Additionally, there is a need to refine user profile management systems and establish robust contractual frameworks to govern data access and usage rights. A generic data space blueprint and building blocks are being developed and governed by the Data Space Support Centre[5]. In parallel, the DeployEMDS[6] builds a decentralised technical infrastructure and common governance mechanisms for urban mobility use cases in 9 cities and regions across Europe.

Consequently, substantial efforts are necessary to fully integrate these approaches into a cohesive and efficient Data Space environment that can effectively support the diverse needs of the CCAM research community and industry. Moreover, extensive datasets are also indispensable for the development of low-level modules such as driver monitoring systems, perception systems, and decision-making algorithms, as well as for sensors like GNSS, radar, cameras, and lidar. While projects like AIthena[7] and AWARE2ALL[8] have generated valuable datasets, the lack of centralised storage and access hampers their utility. Therefore, there is a strong need to incorporate such datasets into a unified CCAM Data Space that is aligned with the data space blueprint, taking advantage of the common building blocks.

By establishing robust interfaces, ontologies, and data management architectures, the CCAM research community and industry can effectively utilise and repurpose existing data, thereby reducing costs, and facilitating the development and validation of CCAM solutions, including the creation of digital twins through synthetic data. The enhanced sharing of data across the CCAM stakeholders should also benefit national authorities, and operators in their efforts to collect KPIs to monitor wider impacts of CCAM solutions including on safety, economy, and society.

Proposed actions for this topic are expected to address all of the following aspects:

  • Identify how to further evolve the data spaces for CCAM applications, connecting existing dataspaces and bridging data gaps;
  • Identify harmonisation and standardisation needs for taxonomies, interfaces, and data formats to push CCAM data exchange and extend and implement the CCAM taxonomies in the CCAM Test Data Space;
  • Identify information needs and reference data for KPIs collected from Member States and Associated Countries (where relevant and to the extent possible) of i.e. high-level socio-economic statistics, accidents, infrastructure, vehicles;
  • Establish a Federated CCAM Data Exchange Platform with tools and governance, including a viable business model to ensure the durability of the platform, which facilitates sharing of data for industry, social partners, authorities and academia that are supporting specific use cases related to: large-scale demonstrations, generation and maintenance of digital twins and representation of scenarios (for development or validation), performance and safety assessment, driver behaviour data from real and synthetic driving conditions, ADS regulation monitoring, AI model training, and common information source for national/EU level statistics and Key Performance Indicators;
  • Identify and describe methods/algorithms/processes to refine and use data for the specific use cases tackled by the Platform;
  • Identify the effects of the EU General Data Protection Legislation (GDPR) on AI learning workflows and possible mitigation measures.

A strong alignment with the common European mobility data space and related projects[9] is expected. The work should ensure coherence and interoperability with other common European data spaces, especially regarding its cross-sectoral blueprint and building blocks, by aligning with the Data Spaces Support Centre and by using, as far as possible, the smart cloud-to-edge middleware platform Simpl[10]. The work should build on the outcomes of the FAME project and the FAME Test Data Space (Data Sharing - Connected Automated Driving). Finally, links with related activities under the future European Digital Infrastructure Consortium (EDIC) for Mobility and Logistics Data and cooperation with the CCAM Partnership’s States Representative Group (SRG) is expected. Particular attention should be dedicated towards establishing interoperability standards for data sharing within and across data ecosystems, through the implementation of the FAIR data principles and leveraging already adopted practices, especially in relevant European common data spaces.

In order to achieve the expected outcomes, international cooperation is encouraged in particular with Japan and the United States but also with other relevant strategic partners in third countries.

This topic implements the co-programmed European Partnership on ‘Connected, Cooperative and Automated Mobility’ (CCAM). As such, projects resulting from this topic will be expected to report on results to the European Partnership ‘Connected, Cooperative and Automated Mobility’ (CCAM) in support of the monitoring of its KPIs.

Projects resulting from this topic are expected to apply the European Common Evaluation Methodology (EU-CEM) for CCAM[11].

null

Activities are expected to achieve TRL 6-7 by the end of the project – see General Annex B. Activities may start at any TRL.

[1] Creating a common European mobility data space - European Commission (europa.eu)

[2] Framework for coordination of Automated Mobility in Europe, grant agreement ID: 101069898.

[3] Safety assUraNce fRamework for connected, automated mobIlity SystEms, grant agreement ID: 101069573.

[4] Real and synthetic scenarios generated for the development, training, virtual testing and validation of CCAM systems, grant agreement ID: 101146542.

[5] Data Spaces Blueprint

[6] See for more information: https://deployemds.eu/

[7] AI-based CCAM: Trustworthy, Explainable, and Accountable, grant agreement ID: 101076754.

[8] Safety systems and human-machine interfaces oriented to diverse population towards future scenarios with increasing share of highly automated vehicles, grant agreement ID: 101076868.

[9] The awarded proposal should build on the outcomes of the preparatory action PrepDSpace4Mobility and the EMDS study under CEF. It should collaborate and align the deployEMDS project and the future action under call DIGITAL-2024-CLOUD-AI-06-MOBSPACE.

[10] More information here.

[11] See the evaluation methodology here.

News flashes

2026-10-24

EVALUATION results

Published: 6 May 2025

Deadline: 20 January 2026

The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:

D2-01

D2-04

D2-05

D2-09

D5-17

D6-03

D6-04

Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)

30

29

24

18

16

28

4

Number of inadmissible proposals

0

0

0

2

1

3

0

Number of ineligible proposals

1

0

1

0

1

0

0

Number of above-threshold proposals

20

26

18

12

6

19

3

Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR)

157,195,820.96

248,601,723.75

132,166,046.82

17,988,579.24

47,945,477.95

75,990,887.37

14,965,660.09

Number of proposals retained for funding

3

3

2

1

2

2

1

Number of proposals in the reserve list

3

3

2

2

2

3

2

Funding threshold (1)

13.50

15.00

13.50

15.00

12.50

14.50

14.50

Ranking distribution

Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14

2

5

1

4

0

2

1

Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13

2

6

3

3

1

5

0

Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10

16

15

14

5

5

12

2

D6-05

D6-06

D6-07

D6-08

D6-09

D6-10

D6-13

Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)

12

4

25

19

4

10

48

Number of inadmissible proposals

0

0

1

5

0

0

1

Number of ineligible proposals

0

0

3

1

1

0

0

Number of above-threshold proposals

9

3

18

6

3

9

32

Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR)

36,134,090.35

11,848,306.66

185,736,461.70

46,503,126.51

10,115,009.66

70,959,683.30

158,537,805.84

Number of proposals retained for funding

1

1

2

2

1

2

2

Number of proposals in the reserve list

3

2

2

2

2

2

2

Funding threshold (1)

14.00

14.50

14.00

13.50

13.50

14.50

14.50

Ranking distribution

Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14

1

1

2

1

0

2

4

Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13

5

2

3

1

2

2

4

Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10

3

0

13

4

1

5

24

D6-14

D6-15

Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)

59

8

Number of inadmissible proposals

3

1

Number of ineligible proposals

0

0

Number of above-threshold proposals

46

4

Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR)

228,771,694.64

15,994,205.72

Number of proposals retained for funding

2

1

Number of proposals in the reserve list

2

2

Funding threshold (1)

13.50

15.00

Ranking distribution

Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14

1

2

Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13

7

0

Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10

38

2

(1) Proposals with the same score were ranked according to the priority order procedure set out in the call conditions (for HE, in the General Annexes to the Work Programme or specific arrangements in the specific call/topic conditions). To determine the ranking for ‘Innovation actions’, the score for ‘Impact’ is given a weight of 1.5.

Summary of observer report:

“The evaluation was a long and complex task, with a large number of topics. The evaluators were drawn from a diverse range of backgrounds and were experts in their field. All experts were fully committed to the process and produced good quality individual reports, supported by very able project officers and moderators. The rapporteurs fully supported moderators and project officers in ensuring that the consensus meetings were conducted appropriately, and in a fair manner. In conclusion, this was a fair, equitable and well-conducted evaluation, which complied with the rules of the call.”

We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.

For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.

2026-10-24

The call for proposals HORIZON-CL5-2026-01 has closed on 20 January 2026.

338 proposals have been submitted. The breakdown per topic is:

  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-01 (IA): 30
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-04 (RIA): 29
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-05 (IA): 24
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D2-09 (CSA): 18
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D5-17 (IA): 16
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-03 (RIA): 28
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-04 (RIA): 4
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-05 (RIA): 12
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-06 (IA): 4
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-07 (IA): 25
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-08 (IA): 19
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-09 (CSA): 4
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-10 (IA): 10
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-13 (RIA): 48
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-14 (RIA): 59
  • HORIZON-CL5-2026-01-D6-15 (RIA): 8

Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in May/June 2026.

2026-10-24

As call HORIZON-CL5-2026-01 is from Horizon Europe Work Programme 2025, the relevant General Annexes apply:

https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/wp-call/2025/wp-14-general-annexes_horizon-2025_en.pdf

Applicants are advised to use the dedicated versions of the application form template found in the application/submission form of their proposal.

call topic details
Call status: Closed
Opening date: 2025-09-25 (1 year ago)
Closing date: 2026-01-20 (9 months ago)
Procedure: single-stage

Budget: 4,000,000
Expected grants: 1
Contribution: 4,000,000 - 4,000,000
News flashes

This call topic has been appended 3 times by the EC with news.

  • 2026-10-24
    evaluation resultspublished: 6 may 2025d...
  • 2026-10-24
    the call for proposals horizon-cl5-2026-...
  • 2026-10-24
    as call horizon-cl5-2026-01 is from hori...
Source information

Showing the latest information. Found 9 versions of this call topic in the F&T portal.

Information from

  • 2026-05-13_06-37-26
  • 2026-02-10_06-32-57
  • 2026-01-21_06-32-21
  • 2026-01-16_06-32-19
  • 2026-01-14_06-32-00
  • 2025-10-28_15-45-42
  • 2025-07-24_06-30-06
  • 2025-07-18_03-30-14
  • 2025-06-07_03-30-10

Check the differences between the versions.

Annotations

You must be logged in to add annotations
No annotations yet

Events

Hand-picked events relevant to this call topic.

No events yet

There are currently no events linked to this call topic.

Timeline

Track where this call stands in its lifecycle, from work programme to grant signature, and see what's likely to happen next.

Grant agreement signed · 20 Sep 2026 (1 month ago)

All expected milestones for this call have passed.

Today

Call published

07 Jun 2025

Work programme published

25 Jul 2025 · est.

Call opens

25 Sep 2025

Call closes

20 Jan 2026

Outcome expected

20 Jun 2026 · est.

Grant agreement signed

20 Sep 2026 · est.

Preparation Open for submission Evaluation Grant preparation Not yet reached
  1. Call published

    07 Jun 2025 · 1 year ago

    This topic was first published in TopicTree.

  2. Work programme published Estimated

    25 Jul 2025 · 1 year ago

    Topics are listed in the Work Programme before the call opens. Spotting this early gives you a head start on partner search and proposal planning.

  3. Call opens

    25 Sep 2025 · 1 year ago

    Submissions can be made from this date.

  4. Call closes

    20 Jan 2026 · 9 months ago

    Deadline to submit a proposal.

  5. Outcome expected Estimated

    20 Jun 2026 · 4 months ago

    The maximum time to inform applicants of the evaluation outcome is five months after the call closes.

  6. Grant agreement signed Estimated

    20 Sep 2026 · 1 month ago

    The maximum time to sign the grant agreement is three months after applicants are informed of the outcome.

Funded Projects

Loading...

Project information comes from CORDIS (for Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe) and will be sourced from F&T Portal (for Digital Europe projects)

Ecosystem bubbles

This call topic is part of the following thematic bubbles.

Not part of a bubble yet

This call topic has not been grouped into an ecosystem bubble.

Call document info

This section will come soon and contain the scraped information from the call document, such as the expected impact, scope, and other relevant sections. In the meantime, you can find this information in the call text section or directly on the F&T portal. View on F&T portal